Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34959998›Full record

ArticleNutrients2021

The Viable Microbiome of Human Milk Differs from the Metataxonomic Profile.

Lisa F Stinson, Michelle L Trevenen, Donna T Geddes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Gut microbiome and breast-feeding: Implications for early immune development.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lisa F StinsonSchool of Molecular Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley 6009, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2799-2727
Michelle L TrevenenCentre for Applied Statistics, The University of Western Australia, Crawley 6009, Australia.
Donna T GeddesSchool of Molecular Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley 6009, Australia.

Funding

Medela (Switzerland) NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteria in human milk contribute to the establishment of the infant gut microbiome. As such, numerous studies have characterized the human milk microbiome using DNA sequencing technologies, particularly 16S rRNA gene sequencing. However, such methods are not able to differentiate between DNA from viable and non-viable bacteria. The extent to which bacterial DNA detected in human milk represents living, biologically active cells is therefore unclear. Here, we characterized both the viable bacterial content and the total bacterial DNA content (derived from viable and non-viable cells) of fresh human milk (

Indexed as

Microbial ViabilityMicrobiotaAzidesBacteriaBreast FeedingDNA, BacterialFemaleGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansMilk, HumanPropidiumRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNAAzidesDNA, BacterialPropidiumpropidium monoazideRNA, Ribosomal, 16Sbreastfeedinghuman milkmicrobiomepropidium monoazide (PMA)viability

Identifiers

PMID34959998
PMCPMC8708405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.