Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34959887›Full record

Trial reportNutrients2021

Nutri-Score: The Most Efficient Front-of-Pack Nutrition Label to Inform Portuguese Consumers on the Nutritional Quality of Foods and Help Them Identify Healthier Options in Purchasing Situations.

Francisco Goiana-da-Silva, David Cruz-E-Silva, Catarina Nobre-da-Costa, Alexandre Morais Nunes, Morgane Fialon, Manon Egnell, Pilar Galan, Chantal Julia, Zenobia Talati, Simone Pettigrew and 3 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrients, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Francisco Goiana-da-SilvaCentre for Health Policy, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College of London, London SW7 2BX, UK.
David Cruz-E-SilvaCenter for Innovation, Technology and Policy Research, Universidade de Lisboa, 1049-004 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-1978-9446
Catarina Nobre-da-CostaAssociação Portuguesa de Jovens Farmacêuticos (APJF), 1169-075 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-9311-3375
Alexandre Morais NunesCenter for Innovation, Technology and Policy Research, Universidade de Lisboa, 1049-004 Lisboa, Portugal.
Morgane FialonSorbonne Paris Nord University, Inserm U1153, Inrae U1125, Cnam, Nutritional Epidemiology Research Team (EREN), Epidemiology and Statistics Research Center, University of Paris (CRESS), 93000 Bobigny, France.
Manon EgnellSorbonne Paris Nord University, Inserm U1153, Inrae U1125, Cnam, Nutritional Epidemiology Research Team (EREN), Epidemiology and Statistics Research Center, University of Paris (CRESS), 93000 Bobigny, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5012-3573
Pilar GalanSorbonne Paris Nord University, Inserm U1153, Inrae U1125, Cnam, Nutritional Epidemiology Research Team (EREN), Epidemiology and Statistics Research Center, University of Paris (CRESS), 93000 Bobigny, France.
Chantal JuliaSorbonne Paris Nord University, Inserm U1153, Inrae U1125, Cnam, Nutritional Epidemiology Research Team (EREN), Epidemiology and Statistics Research Center, University of Paris (CRESS), 93000 Bobigny, France.
Zenobia TalatiSchool of Psychology, Curtin University, Kent St, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6577-4969
Simone PettigrewThe George Institute for Global Health, Newtown, Sydney, NSW 2042, Australia.
Ara DarziCentre for Health Policy, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College of London, London SW7 2BX, UK.
Fernando AraújoCentro Hospitalar e Universitário de São João, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal.
Serge HercbergSorbonne Paris Nord University, Inserm U1153, Inrae U1125, Cnam, Nutritional Epidemiology Research Team (EREN), Epidemiology and Statistics Research Center, University of Paris (CRESS), 93000 Bobigny, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several studies have identified Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labels (FoPLs) as a promising strategy to improve the nutritional quality of consumers' food choices and encourage manufacturers to offer healthier products. This study aims to fill the evidence gap regarding the most effective FoPL among the Portuguese population. In total, 1059 Portuguese participants were recruited through a web panel provider and asked to declare their intended food choices and to rank three sets of products (pizza, cakes and breakfast cereals) according to their nutritional quality, first in the absence of any labelling, and then with a FoPL displayed on-pack (five FoPLs tested). Finally, participants were asked to answer nine statements related to perceptions of FoPLs. Results showed that participants improved their food choices, depending on the FoPL and the food category. All FoPLs led to a higher percentage of correct responses on the ranking task compared to the no label condition. The Nutri-Score was among the FoPLs producing the greatest improvement across all food categories compared to the reference intakes (OR = 6.45 [4.43-9.39],

Indexed as

Nutritive ValueAdolescentAdultChoice BehaviorConsumer BehaviorDiet, HealthyFemaleFood LabelingFood PreferencesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPortugalRecommended Dietary AllowancesSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultdietFront-of-Pack Nutrition Labelnutritional qualityPortuguese consumerspublic health

Identifiers

PMID34959887
PMCPMC8705821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.