Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34959697›Full record

ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Safety of Cerebrolysin for Neurorecovery after Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Twelve Randomized-Controlled Trials.

Stefan Strilciuc, László Vécsei, Dana Boering, Aleš Pražnikar, Oliver Kaut, Peter Riederer, Leontino Battistin

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. C-REGS2-A multinational, high-quality comparative effectiveness study of Cerebrolysin in moderate acute ischemic stroke.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2025
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Current neuroprotective agents in stroke.Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2024
    Review
  16. Life-Threatening Anaphylaxis due to Cerebrolysin®.Case reports in neurological medicine · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Stefan StrilciucDepartment of Neuroscience, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400364 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
László VécseiDepartment of Neurology, University of Szeged, H-6725 Szeged, Hungary.
Dana BoeringSRH Gesundheitszentrum Bad Wimpfen, 74206 Bad Wimpfen, Germany.
Aleš PražnikarInstitute for Neurological Sciences, Queen Elisabeth University, G51 4TF Glasgow, Ireland.
Oliver KautDepartment of Neurology, University of Bonn, Regina-Pacis-Weg 3, 53113 Bonn, Germany.
Peter RiedererClinic and Polyclinic for Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.
Leontino BattistinDepartment of Neurosciences, University of Padova, 35122 Padova, Italy.
Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROPHV Dialysezentrum · DEUniversity of Bonn · DEUniversity of Padua · ITUniversity of Southern Denmark · DKUniversity of Szeged · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We performed a systematic search and meta-analysis of available literature to determine the safety profile of Cerebrolysin in acute ischemic stroke, filling existing safety information gaps and inconsistent results. We searched EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane Databases of Systematic Reviews and Clinical Trials up to the end of February 2021. Data collection and analysis were conducted using methods described in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. All safety outcomes were analyzed based on risk ratios (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals. The meta-analysis pooled 2202 patients from twelve randomized clinical trials, registering non-statistically significant (

Indexed as

Cerebrolysinischemic strokeneurorehabilitationsafety

Identifiers

PMID34959697
PMCPMC8708612
OpenAlexW4226332183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.