Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34959451›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2021

Parametric and Nonparametric Population Pharmacokinetic Models to Assess Probability of Target Attainment of Imipenem Concentrations in Critically Ill Patients.

Femke de Velde, Brenda C M de Winter, Michael N Neely, Jan Strojil, Walter M Yamada, Stephan Harbarth, Angela Huttner, Teun van Gelder, Birgit C P Koch, Anouk E Muller and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Femke de VeldeDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Brenda C M de WinterDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Michael N NeelyLaboratory of Applied Pharmacokinetics, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90027, USA.
Jan StrojilDepartment of Pharmacology, Palacky University, CZ-779 00 Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Walter M YamadaLaboratory of Applied Pharmacokinetics, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90027, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3512-9202
Stephan HarbarthDivision of Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland.
Angela HuttnerDivision of Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland.
Teun van GelderDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Birgit C P KochDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Anouk E MullerDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5042-6251
On Behalf Of The Combacte-Net Consortium
Erasmus MC · NLUniversity Hospital of Geneva · CHUniversity of Southern California · USPalacký University Olomouc · CZ

Funding

AIDA Health-F3-2011-278348Innovative Medicines Initiative 115523Palacký University, Olomouc IGA UPOL2014 LF 008University Hospital of Geneva PRD 09-II-025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Population pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation (M&S) are used to improve antibiotic dosing. Little is known about the differences in parametric and nonparametric M&S. Our objectives were to compare (1) the external validation of parametric and nonparametric models of imipenem in critically ill patients and (2) the probability of target attainment (PTA) calculations using simulations of both models. The M&S software used was NONMEM 7.2 (parametric) and Pmetrics 1.5.2 (nonparametric). The external predictive performance of both models was adequate for eGFRs ≥ 78 mL/min but insufficient for lower eGFRs, indicating that the models (developed using a population with eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min) could not be extrapolated to lower eGFRs. Simulations were performed for three dosing regimens and three eGFRs (90, 120, 150 mL/min). Fifty percent of the PTA results were similar for both models, while for the other 50% the nonparametric model resulted in lower MICs. This was explained by a higher estimated between-subject variability of the nonparametric model. Simulations indicated that 1000 mg q6h is suitable to reach MICs of 2 mg/L for eGFRs of 90-120 mL/min. For MICs of 4 mg/L and for higher eGFRs, dosing recommendations are missing due to largely different PTA values per model. The consequences of the different modeling approaches in clinical practice should be further investigated.

Indexed as

imipenemnonparametricparametricpopulation pharmacokinetic modelingsimulations

Identifiers

PMID34959451
PMCPMC8709176
OpenAlexW4200075491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.