ArticlePharmaceutics2021
Large-Scale Evaluation of Collision Cross Sections to Investigate Blood-Brain Barrier Permeation of Drugs.
Article in Pharmaceutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predicting blood-brain barrier permeability of molecules with a large language model and machine learning.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Successful drug administration to the central nervous system requires accurate adjustment of the drugs' molecular properties. Therefore, structure-derived descriptors of potential brain therapeutic agents are essential for an early evaluation of pharmacokinetics during drug development. The collision cross section (CCS) of molecules was recently introduced as a novel measurable parameter to describe blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeation. This descriptor combines molecular information about mass, structure, volume, branching and flexibility. As these chemical properties are known to influence cerebral pharmacokinetics, CCS determination of new drug candidates may provide important additional spatial information to support existing models of BBB penetration of drugs. Besides measuring CCS, calculation is also possible; but however, the reliability of computed CCS values for an evaluation of BBB permeation has not yet been fully investigated. In this work, prediction tools based on machine learning were used to compute CCS values of a large number of compounds listed in drug libraries as negative or positive with respect to brain penetration (BBB
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.