ArticlePharmaceutics2021
The Impact of Surface Drug Distribution on the Acoustic Behavior of DOX-Loaded Microbubbles.
Article in Pharmaceutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluating the Effect of Drug Loading on the Acoustic Response of Nanobubbles in Stable and Inertial Cavitation Regimes.IEEE open journal of ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2025Article
- Nanotechnology-enabled sonodynamic therapy against malignant tumors.Nanoscale advances · 2024Review
- Oxygen-loaded microbubble-mediated sonoperfusion and oxygenation for neuroprotection after ischemic stroke reperfusion.Biomaterials research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Previous studies have reported substantial improvement of microbubble (MB)-mediated drug delivery with ultrasound when drugs are loaded onto the MB shell compared with a physical mixture. However, drug loading may affect shell properties that determine the acoustic responsiveness of MBs, producing unpredictable outcomes. The aim of this study is to reveal how the surface loaded drug (doxorubicin, DOX) affects the acoustic properties of MBs. A suitable formulation of MBs for DOX loading was first identified by regulating the proportion of two lipid materials (1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DSPC) and 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-rac-glycerol sodium salt (DSPG)) with distinct electrostatic properties. We found that the DOX loading capacity of MBs was determined by the proportion of DSPG, since there was an electrostatic interaction with DOX. The DOX payload reduced the lipid fluidity of MBs, although this effect was dependent on the spatial uniformity of DOX on the MB shell surface. Loading DOX onto MBs enhanced acoustic stability 1.5-fold, decreased the resonance frequency from 12-14 MHz to 5-7 MHz, and reduced stable cavitation dose by 1.5-fold, but did not affect the stable cavitation threshold (300 kPa). Our study demonstrated that the DOX reduces lipid fluidity and decreases the elasticity of the MB shell, thereby influencing the acoustic properties of MBs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.