ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2022
Subtotal esophagectomy followed by subtotal gastric reconstruction for Boerhaave's syndrome: Case report with literature review.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic Approach and Therapeutic Management of Spontaneous Esophageal Perforation (Boerhaave's Syndrome): A Systematic Review and Individual Patient-Level Pooled Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Successful multistage surgical management of Boerhaave syndrome: a case report and review of the literature.Journal of medical case reports · 2026Review
- Esophageal Perforation Following Pneumatic Dilation in Esophageal Achalasia Successfully Managed with Two-Stage Laparoscopic Surgery.Surgical case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionBoerhaave's syndrome, or spontaneous esophageal rupture, is a potentially fatal disease requiring prompt diagnosis and effective treatment. We report Boerhaave's syndrome in a patient who underwent subtotal esophagectomy and temporary cervical esophagostomy for esophageal perforation to the right thoracic cavity, followed by subtotal gastric reconstruction as the second step. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 70-year-old man with diarrhea and vomiting as chief complaints had underlying disease of reflux esophagitis. He experienced frequent hematemesis. Computed tomography (CT) at another hospital revealed right pleural effusion and abnormal mediastinal air and fluid retention around the esophagus, and he was transferred to our hospital. From the CT findings, he was diagnosed as having Boerhaave's syndrome with esophageal perforation into the right thoracic cavity. He was in shock, and emergency right thoracotomy was performed, revealing a severely purulent thoracic cavity, ruptured parietal pleura, and 5-cm perforation in the right front middle esophageal wall that was surrounded by mucosal necrosis. Subtotal esophagectomy, temporal cervical esophagostomy, and enteral feeding tube insertion were performed. After hospital discharge, he underwent subtotal gastric reconstruction 43 days postoperatively. His course was good, and he was transferred to another hospital for rehabilitation 36 days after reconstruction. DISCUSSION: In Boerhaave's syndrome, depending on the size of the perforation and fragility of the esophageal wall, subtotal esophagectomy may be feasible.
conclusionTwo-step reconstruction following esophageal rupture is possible after sufficient local infection control, and anastomosis can be performed if the patient's general condition is good, but only under conditions that guarantee no anastomotic leakage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.