Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34959077›Full record

ArticleAddictive behaviors2022

Substance, use in relation to COVID-19: A scoping review.

Navin Kumar, Kamila Janmohamed, Kate Nyhan, Silvia S Martins, Magdalena Cerda, Deborah Hasin, Jenny Scott, Afia Sarpong Frimpong, Richard Pates, Lilian A Ghandour and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Addictive behaviors, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Navin KumarHuman Nature Lab, Department of Sociology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA. Electronic address: navin.kumar@yale.edu.
Kamila JanmohamedYale College, New Haven, CT, USA.
Kate NyhanHarvey Cushing/John Hay Whitney Medical Library, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA; Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.
Silvia S MartinsDepartment of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA.
Magdalena CerdaCenter for Opioid Epidemiology and Policy, Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Deborah HasinDepartment of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA.
Jenny ScottDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Afia Sarpong FrimpongYale College, New Haven, CT, USA.
Richard PatesInstitute of Health and Society, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK.
Lilian A GhandourDepartment of Epidemiology and Population Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Mayyada WazaifyDepartment of Biopharmaceuticals and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Kaveh KhoshnoodDepartment of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.
Yale University · USColumbia University · USAmerican University of Beirut · LBNew York University · USUniversity of Bath · GBUniversity of Jordan · JOUniversity of Worcester · GB

Funding

Impact of Medical and Recreational Marijuana Laws On Cannabis, Opioids And Psychiatric Medications: National Study of VA Patients, 2000 - 2024R01DA048860 · NIDA · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI HASIN, DEBORAH S · 2019 to 2023
$4.1M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA048860
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe conducted a scoping review focused on various forms of substance use amid the pandemic, looking at both the impact of substance use on COVID-19 infection, severity, and vaccine uptake, as well as the impact that COVID-19 has had on substance use treatment and rates.

methodsA scoping review, compiling both peer-reviewed and grey literature, focusing on substance use and COVID-19 was conducted on September 15, 2020 and again in April 15, 2021 to capture any new studies. Three bibliographic databases (Web of Science Core Collection, Embase, PubMed) and several preprint servers (EuropePMC, bioRxiv, medRxiv, F1000, PeerJ Preprints, PsyArXiv, Research Square) were searched. We included English language original studies only.

resultsOf 1564 articles screened in the abstract and title screening phase, we included 111 research studies (peer-reviewed: 98, grey literature: 13) that met inclusion criteria. There was limited research on substance use other than those involving tobacco or alcohol. We noted that individuals engaging in substance use had increased risk for COVID-19 severity, and Black Americans with COVID-19 and who engaged in substance use had worse outcomes than white Americans. There were issues with treatment provision earlier in the pandemic, but increased use of telehealth as the pandemic progressed. COVID-19 anxiety was associated with increased substance use.

conclusionsOur scoping review of studies to date during COVID-19 uncovered notable research gaps namely the need for research efforts on vaccines, COVID-19 concerns such as anxiety and worry, and low- to middle-income countries (LMICs) and under-researched topics within substance use, and to explore the use of qualitative techniques and interventions where appropriate. We also noted that clinicians can screen and treat individuals exhibiting substance use to mitigate effects of the pandemic.

fundingStudy was funded by the Institution for Social and Policy Studies, Yale University and The Horowitz Foundation for Social Policy. DH was funded by a NIDA grant (R01DA048860). The funding body had no role in the design, analysis, or interpretation of the data in the study.

Indexed as

COVID-19Substance-Related DisordersTelemedicineHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2COVID-19LockdownSubstance use

Identifiers

PMID34959077
PMCPMC8684053
OpenAlexW4200350238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.