ArticleMidwifery2022
Comparison of quality, birth outcomes, and service utilization between health facilities with and without maternity waiting homes in Liberia.
Article in Midwifery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Provider and client perspectives on the use of maternity waiting homes in rural Rwanda.Global health action · 2023Article
- Readiness of health facilities to provide safe childbirth in Liberia: a cross-sectional analysis of population surveys, facility censuses and facility birth records.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objective1) To assess the quality of health facilities associated with functional Maternity Waiting Homes and health facilities without functional maternity waiting homes in Liberia. 2) To examine birth outcomes and care utilization amongst health facilities with and without functional maternity waiting homes in Liberia.
designSecondary analysis design using data from a facility capacity checklist and Liberia's Health Management Information System.
setting71 health facilities associated with functional maternity waiting homes and 14 health facilities without functional maternity waiting homes across 14 counties of Liberia.
participantsNo human participants were used in this study.
methodsIndependent t-test, Pearson chi-square test, and logistic regression were performed to assess quality, birth outcomes, and service utilization between health facilities with and without functional maternity waiting homes.
findingsThe overall health facility quality was not significantly different between health facilities associated with functional maternity waiting homes and those without. However, health facilities with functional maternity waiting homes had better infection control with the presence of soap and sharps boxes. Health facilities with functional maternity waiting homes were also more likely to have parenteral oxytocic drugs and were better able to perform assisted vaginal deliveries. The presence of functional maternity waiting homes were not significantly associated with health facility quality, birth outcomes, or care utilization. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Health facilities with functional MWHs were better prepared to prevent infection and manage complicated deliveries. This study further highlights specific areas for quality improvement amongst these health facilities, including labor complications management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.