Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34958531›Full record

Trial reportBJU international2022

Population-based randomized trial of screening for clinically significant prostate cancer ProScreen: a pilot study.

Antti Rannikko, Mare Leht, Tuomas Mirtti, Anu Kenttämies, Teemu Tolonen, Irina Rinta-Kiikka, Tuomas P Kilpeläinen, Kari Natunen, Hans Lilja, Terho Lehtimäki and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BJU international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Prostate cancer screening.Asian journal of urology · 2025
    Review
  4. Update on Liquid Biopsy.Radiology · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Risk of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer after a Nonsuspicious Prostate MRI-A Comparison with the General Population.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Antti RannikkoDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-4261-3484
Mare LehtFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Tuomas MirttiResearch Programme in Systems Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-0455-9891
Anu KenttämiesRadiology, HUS Diagnostic Centre, HUS Medical Imaging Centre, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-3937-5307
Teemu TolonenDepartment of Pathology, Fimlab Laboratories, Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-2029-6497
Irina Rinta-KiikkaDepartment of Radiology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-5926-0454
Tuomas P KilpeläinenDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-7697-0148
Kari NatunenFaculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-3081-211X
Hans LiljaDepartments of Laboratory Medicine, Surgery, and Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5871-7846
Terho LehtimäkiDepartment of Clinical Chemistry, Fimlab Laboratories, Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-2555-4427
Jani RaitanenFaculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-7674-0978
Paula KujalaDepartment of Pathology, Fimlab Laboratories, Tampere, Finland.
Johanna RonkainenDepartment of Radiology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Mika MatikainenDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-7223-7723
Anssi PetasDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-5370-2378
Kimmo TaariDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-0077-4896
Teuvo TammelaFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-3529-4649
Anssi AuvinenFaculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-1125-4818
University of Helsinki · FITampere University · FIFimlab (Finland) · FITampere University Hospital · FIAava Medical Centre · FIMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
SPORE In Prostate CancerP50CA092629 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI JAMES A EASTHAM · 2001 to 2026
$63.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P50 CA092629
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the feasibility of a population-based screening trial using prostate-specific antigen (PSA), a kallikrein panel and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) aimed at minimizing overdiagnosis, while retaining mortality benefit. PATIENTS AND

methodsFeasibility of the screening algorithm was evaluated in terms of participation, screening test results and cancer detection. A random sample of 400 men aged 65 years was identified from the population registry and invited for screening with three stepwise tests (PSA, kallikrein panel and MRI). Men with PSA levels ≥3 ng/mL were further tested with the kallikrein panel, and those with positive findings (risk >7.5%) were referred for prostate MRI. Men with positive MRI (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System [PI-RADS] score 3-5) had targeted biopsies only. Men with negative MRI, but PSA density ≥0.15 underwent systematic biopsies.

resultsOf the 399 men invited, 158 (40%) participated and 27 had PSA levels ≥3 ng/mL (7% of the invited and 17% of the participants). Of these, 22 had a positive kallikrein panel (6% of the invited and 81% of the PSA-positive men). Finally, 10 men (3% of the invited and 45% of 4Kscore [kallikrein panel]-positive) had a suspicious MRI finding (PI-RADS score ≥3) and five were diagnosed with a clinically significant prostate cancer (Gleason Grade Group [GG] ≥2) at fusion biopsy (3% of the participants), with two GG 1 cases (1%). Additional testing (kallikrein panel and MRI) after PSA reduced biopsies by 56%.

conclusionThe findings constitute proof of principle for our screening protocol, as we achieved a substantial detection rate for clinically significant cancer with few clinically insignificant cases. Participation, however, was suboptimal.

Indexed as

Prostate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerHumansImage-Guided BiopsyKallikreinsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePilot ProjectsKallikreinsProstate-Specific Antigen4-kallikrein panelmultiparametric MRI#PCSMprostate cancer#ProstateCancerprostate-specific antigenrandomized trialscreeningtargeted biopsy#uroonc

Identifiers

PMID34958531
PMCPMC9327584
OpenAlexW4200507622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.