ArticlePediatric blood & cancer2022
"Some things are even worse than telling a child he is going to die": Pediatric oncology healthcare professionals perspectives on communicating with children about cancer and end of life.
Article in Pediatric blood & cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Communicating With Children With Cancer: Development of a Chatbot-Based Educational Support Tool.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026Article
- Nurses' stressful experiences in providing palliative and end-of-life care for children: A meta-synthesis.Palliative & supportive care · 2026Review
- Navigating existential conversations about life and death with families in paediatric palliative care: a qualitative interview study with healthcare professionals.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Nurses' experiences of end-of-life communication with children who have life-threatening conditions in paediatric intensive care units: a qualitative descriptive study.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Healthcare professionals' perspectives on disclosure of diagnosis and related issues in childhood cancer: A mixed methods systematic review.International journal of nursing sciences · 2026Review
- Cancer care disparities among patients with limited English proficiency: challenges and strategies for equity.BJC reports · 2025Review
- Inclusive mentorship of pediatric trainees: pediatric oncology as a microcosm.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Psychotherapeutic approaches: hopefully, globally effective.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
- Adolescent and Young Adult Initiated Discussions of Advance Care Planning: Family Member, Friend and Health Care Provider Perspectives.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Challenges and needs among pediatric oncology providers in caring for pediatric brain tumor patients and survivors: A qualitative study.International journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHPArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThis study explored pediatric oncology healthcare professionals' (HCPs) perspectives on direct communication with children with advanced disease about their disease, palliative care, and end-of-life (EOL) communication.
methodsForty-six pediatric oncologists, nurses, psychosocial team members, and other HCPs from six hospital centers in Israel participated in semi-structured interviews. The Grounded Theory method was used. Data were analyzed line-by-line with codes and categories developed inductively from participants' narratives.
resultsHCPs viewed communication about disease progression and EOL as vital because children were often aware of their prognosis, because lack of communication could lead to emotional distress, and because communication is a prerequisite for shared decision-making. HCPs identified several barriers for communication including HCP barriers (such as emotional strains, lack of training), parental barriers, guardianship law, and language and culture. HCPs also described strategies to promote EOL communication. Direct strategies include tailoring communication, allowing for silence, echoing children's questions, giving information gradually, and answering direct questions honestly. Indirect strategies included encouraging parents to talk to their children and teamwork with colleagues.
conclusionsOpen communication with children who have cancer is essential. Nevertheless, multiple barriers persist. The rising accessibility of online information calls for urgent training of HCPs in communication so that children will not turn to unmediated and potentially misleading information online in the absence of HCP communication. Evidence-based effective communication training modules and emotional support should be offered to HCPs. Knowledge about children's development, age-appropriate communication, and cultural sensitivity should be included in this training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.