Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34958449›Full record

SynthesisJournal of occupational rehabilitation2022

Employment Sustainability for People with Intellectual Disability: A Systematic Review.

Helena Taubner, Magnus Tideman, Carin Staland Nyman

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Thinking Together; A Social Care Learning Community, '10 Minutes of Britney' and Flourishing Lives.Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. People with intellectual disability and employment sustainability: A qualitative interview study.Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Helena TaubnerSchool of Health and Welfare, Halmstad University, Box 823, 301 18, Halmstad, Sweden. helena.taubner@hh.se.ORCID 0000-0002-0826-4735
Magnus TidemanSchool of Health and Welfare, Halmstad University, Box 823, 301 18, Halmstad, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7519-6488
Carin Staland NymanSchool of Health and Welfare, Halmstad University, Box 823, 301 18, Halmstad, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4773-1447

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose Previous reviews about employment for people with intellectual disability (ID) have left questions about employment sustainability unanswered. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review was to identify and analyse research regarding employment sustainability for people with ID. The research questions were: What research about employment sustainability for people with ID has been published internationally between 2010 and 2020? In the identified studies, how is employment sustainability defined and measured and what are the main findings regarding employment sustainability? Methods A systematic review was conducted using eight databases from various disciplines including medical, health, and social sciences. After a selection process, 10 articles remained, and a framework matrix was created to analyse them. An employment sustainability definition was used as an analytical tool. Results Ten articles were identified as being about employment sustainability for people with ID. Five of them used qualitative designs and five used quantitative designs. Only four out of ten contained a definition of employment sustainability, and there was an inconsistency in measurement methods. The reported findings in the studied articles were categorised into three types: proportions of long-term employed individuals within the studied population, facilitators and barriers to long-term employment. Conclusions There is only a limited amount of research about employment sustainability for people with ID. Nevertheless, a few facilitators and barriers could be identified. There is no consensus about how to define or measure employment sustainability, making comparisons difficult.

Indexed as

EmploymentIntellectual DisabilityHumansEmploymentIntellectual disabilitySustainabilitySystematic review

Identifiers

PMID34958449
PMCPMC9576651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.