Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34958439›Full record

ArticleDiabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders2022

Differences in Dental Care Referral for Diabetic Patients Between General Practitioners and Diabetes Specialists in Japan, Analyzed from NSAID-Study 3.

Keiko Arai, Tetsuo Nishikawa, Yoko Matsuzawa, Shigeyuki Ohtsu, Shin-Ichiro Shirabe, Shohei Yuasa, Koichi Hirao, Hisao Mori

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trends in the Management of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus by Japanese Practitioners.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Keiko AraiArai Clinic, 1-19, Moegino, Aoba-ku, Yokohama, 227-0044, Japan. arai-cl@n04.itscom.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4691-8469
Tetsuo NishikawaNishikawa Clinic, Yokohama, 222-0033, Japan.
Yoko MatsuzawaMatsuzawa Diabetes Clinic, Yokohama, 230-0077, Japan.
Shigeyuki OhtsuNakanoshima Diabetes Clinic, Kawasaki, 214-0012, Japan.
Shin-Ichiro ShirabeHealth Education Center Science Clinic, Yokohama, 235-0045, Japan.
Shohei YuasaShohei Clinic, Kamakura, 248-0025, Japan.
Koichi HiraoHealth Education Center Science Clinic, Yokohama, 235-0045, Japan.
Hisao MoriFuji Kenshin Center, Fuji, Shizuoka, 416-0908, Japan.
Kanagawa Prefecture Medical Association · JPArak University · IRKawasaki Medical School Hospital · JPNishikawa Hospital · JPShonan Kamakura General Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPeriodontal disease is a common inflammation worldwide and is not only the foremost cause of tooth loss but also a cause of deterioration of glycemic control in patients with diabetes mellitus. In addition, effective glycemic management improves the control of periodontitis infection. The aim of this study was to clarify whether awareness of the need to refer their patients with diabetes to dentists differs between general practitioners and diabetes specialists. This was achieved by secondary analysis of data from the 2018 Nationwide Survey on Actual Intervention for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) by Japanese Practitioners (NSAID Study).

methodsData from 380 general practitioners and 79 diabetes specialists who participated in the NSAID study and responded to the question of whether they referred T2DM patients to the dentist were analyzed in this study.

resultsThe proportion of general practitioners who referred T2DM patients to dentists was significantly lower than that of diabetes specialists (35.4% vs. 64.1%, respectively).

conclusionThis result suggests that the general practitioners who participated in this study were less cognizant of oral hygiene in patients with diabetes than those who specialized in diabetes. It is also necessary to increase the opportunities for education of physicians who provide diabetic care to promote appropriate dental referrals.

Indexed as

General practitionersNationwide surveyOral health carePeriodontal disease; type 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID34958439
PMCPMC8873267
OpenAlexW4200147344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.