Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34958410›Full record

ArticleDie Naturwissenschaften2021

Honeybees with extensive foraging experience rob nectar more frequently.

Yuta Nagano, Tomoyuki Yokoi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Die Naturwissenschaften, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yuta NaganoLaboratory of Conservation Ecology, Faculty of Life and Environmental Science, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennoudai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8572, Japan. 11015.2b@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4074-1228
Tomoyuki YokoiLaboratory of Conservation Ecology, Faculty of Life and Environmental Science, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennoudai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8572, Japan.
University of Tsukuba · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Not all flower-visiting animals act as pollinators; some visitors engage in foraging nectar without pollen transfer. The tendency to rob nectar is related to visitors' morphological traits and rewards per foraging effort, and drivers of this variation within visitor species are largely unknown. Because foraging behavior is affected by foraging experience, we focused on the relationship between the tendency to rob nectar and the foraging experience of each forager. We investigated five consecutive visits of European honeybee, Apis mellifera L., on comfrey, Symphytum officinale L., in Japan. We estimated the foraging experience of A. mellifera using wing wear, categorized into six groups. Approximately 60% and 40% of A. mellifera foragers engaged in legitimate visits and nectar robbing, respectively. Moreover, most A. mellifera engaged in only one foraging tactic. The proportion of nectar robbing was related to wing wear and was higher in individuals with extensively damaged wings than those with less damaged wings. The present study suggests that extensively experienced honeybee foragers tend towards nectar robbing.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorPlant NectarAnimalsBeesFlowersHumansPollenWings, AnimalPlant NectarExperienceFloral larcenyForagingNectar robbingPollinator

Identifiers

PMID34958410
OpenAlexW4200301822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.