Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34958004›Full record

ArticleCancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers2022

Evaluation of CDCP1 (CD318) and endoglin (CD105) expression as prognostic markers in acute myeloid leukemia.

Huda F Ebian, Dina R Issa, Amira S Al-Karamany, Rasha L Etewa, Hanaa M El Maghraby, Samia Hussein

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Huda F EbianClinical Pathology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Dina R IssaInternal Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Helwan University, Helwan, Egypt.
Amira S Al-KaramanyMedical Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Rasha L EtewaPathology Department College of Medicine, Jouf University, Sakaka, Saudi Arabia.
Hanaa M El MaghrabyMedical Microbiology and Immunology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Samia HusseinMedical Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Zagazig University · EGHelwan University · EGJouf University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe most commonly used prognostic factors in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are cytogenetic, molecular, and morphological markers. However, AML prognosis is still unfavorable particularly in adults. So, further reliable markers are urgently needed to improve the risk stratification and treatment decisions. CUB domain-containing protein 1 (CDCP1; CD318) and endoglin (CD105) are new markers correlated with poor prognosis in different solid tumors, but their role in AML prognosis is not fully evaluated.

objectivesThis work aimed to evaluate the prognostic role of CD318 and CD105 in AML and their impact on the outcomes.

methodsSixty-five newly diagnosed AML patients were included in this study. CD318 and CD105 expression was assessed by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Patients were followed up for ∼ 2 years to evaluate the prognostic impact of gene expression on the outcomes.

resultsPatients with high CD318 and CD105 showed higher white blood cell (WBC) count, M2 subtype, poor cytogenetic risk, reduced complete remission, and a greater number of deaths compared to low CD318 and CD105. CD318 was correlated with CD105, and both were correlated with WBC count, bone marrow blasts, and peripheral blood blasts. After a follow-up period of up to 24 months, relapse-free survival for high CD318 and CD105 was significantly different (42.1% and 52.6% vs. 64.5% and 58.1% for low CD318 and CD105, respectively). Survival was worse in patients with high CD318 and CD105, as the mean survival time was 13.9 and 13.3 months compared to 24 and 22.7 months in low CD318 and CD105, respectively.

conclusionsCD318 and CD105 are upregulated in AML patients. Their overexpression was associated with poor response to treatment and poor outcomes. Therefore, CD318 and CD105 can be useful prognostic markers in AML.

Indexed as

Antigens, NeoplasmCell Adhesion MoleculesEndoglinLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteAdultBiomarkers, TumorBone MarrowHumansPrognosisRemission InductionAntigens, NeoplasmBiomarkers, TumorCDCP1 protein, humanCell Adhesion MoleculesEndoglinENG protein, humanAMLCDCP1 (CD318)endoglin (CD105)

Identifiers

PMID34958004
PMCPMC12364276
OpenAlexW4200101827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.