Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34957841›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2022

Neuroscience needs evolution.

Paul Cisek, Benjamin Y Hayden

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
12.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Convergent motifs of early olfactory processing are recapitulated by layer-wise efficient coding.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Simultaneous detection and estimation in olfactory sensing.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Foot placement control underlies stable locomotion across species.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. What could evolve in the evolution of memory?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  11. Embodied cognitive evolution and the limits of convergence.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  12. Humans forage for reward in reinforcement learning tasks.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Kernels of Motor Memory Formation: Temporal Generalization in Bimanual Adaptation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  15. Minds in movement: embodied cognition in the age of artificial intelligence.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  16. Rational inattention in neural coding for economic choice.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Thermotaxis in an apolar, non-neuronal animal.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Paul CisekDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Montréal, 2960 chemin de la tour, local 1107 Montréal, QC H3T 1J4 Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7060-7287
Benjamin Y HaydenDepartment of Neuroscience, Department of Biomedical Engineering, and Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7678-4281
HEC Montréal · CAUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nervous system is a product of evolution. That is, it was constructed through a long series of modifications, within the strong constraints of heredity, and continuously subjected to intense selection pressures. As a result, the organization and functions of the brain are shaped by its history. We believe that this fact, underappreciated in contemporary systems neuroscience, offers an invaluable aid for helping us resolve the brain's mysteries. Indeed, we think that the consideration of evolutionary history ought to take its place alongside other intellectual tools used to understand the brain, such as behavioural experiments, studies of anatomical structure and functional characterization based on recordings of neural activity. In this introduction, we argue for the importance of evolution by highlighting specific examples of ways that evolutionary theory can enhance neuroscience. The rest of the theme issue elaborates this point, emphasizing the conservative nature of neural evolution, the important consequences of specific transitions that occurred in our history, and the ways in which considerations of evolution can shed light on issues ranging from specific mechanisms to fundamental principles of brain organization. This article is part of the theme issue 'Systems neuroscience through the lens of evolutionary theory'.

Indexed as

HeredityNeurosciencesBiological EvolutionBrainNervous Systemdevelopmental neuroscienceevolutionary neuroscienceontologyphylogenetic historypsychology

Identifiers

PMID34957841
PMCPMC8710875
OpenAlexW4200447364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.