ArticleYeast (Chichester, England)2022
Fungal diversity on brewery filling hall surfaces and quality control samples.
Article in Yeast (Chichester, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Methods for Determining the Number of Mold Fungi in the Air-Current Trends.Environmental microbiology reports · 2026Review
- Analysis of the bacterial and fungal populations in South African sorghum beer (umqombothi) using full-length 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2023Article
- Contaminated Perry in Patagonia Argentina: A Case Study.Current microbiology · 2023Article
- Fungal diversity on brewery filling hall surfaces and quality control samples.Yeast (Chichester, England) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breweries produce an increasing selection of beer and nonbeer beverages. Yeast and filamentous fungi may compromise quality and safety of these products in several ways. Recent studies on fungal communities in breweries are scarce and mostly conducted with culture-dependent methods. We explored fungal diversity in the production of alcoholic and nonalcoholic beverages in four breweries. Samples were taken for next generation sequencing (NGS) at the key contamination sites in 10 filling lines. Moreover, fungal isolates were identified in 68 quality control samples taken from raw materials, filling line surfaces, air, and products. NGS gave a comprehensive view of fungal diversity on filling line surfaces. The surface-attached communities mainly contained ascomycetous fungi. Depending on the site, the dominant genera included Candida, Saccharomyces, Torulaspora, Zygosaccharomyces, Alternaria, Didymella, and Exophiala. Sanger sequencing revealed 28 and 27 species of yeast and filamentous fungi, respectively, among 91 isolates. The most common species Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Zygosaccharomyces rouxii, and Wickerhamomuces anomalus were detected throughout production. Filling line surface and air samples showed the greatest diversity of yeast and filamentous fungi, respectively. The isolates of the most common yeast genera Candida, Pichia, Saccharomyces, and Wickerhamomyces showed low spoilage abilities in carbonated, chemically preserved drinks but could grow in products with reduced hurdles. Preservative resistant yeasts were rare, belonging to the species Dekkera bruxellensis, Pichia manschurica, and Zygosaccharomyces bailii. Penicillium spp. were dominant filamentous fungi. The results of this study help to evaluate spoilage risks caused by fungal contaminants detected in breweries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.