Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34957586›Full record

ArticleEquine veterinary journal2022

Atrial fibrillatory rate as predictor of recurrence of atrial fibrillation in horses treated medically or with electrical cardioversion.

Rikke Buhl, Eva M Hesselkilde, Helena Carstensen, Charlotte Hopster-Iversen, Gunther van Loon, Annelies Decloedt, Glenn Van Steenkiste, Celia M Marr, Virginia B Reef, Colin C Schwarzwald and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Equine veterinary journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 8 institutions in 7 countries.

Rikke BuhlDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8201-0186
Eva M HesselkildeDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Helena CarstensenDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Charlotte Hopster-IversenDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Gunther van LoonEquine Cardioteam, Department of Large Animal Internal Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5191-5241
Annelies DecloedtEquine Cardioteam, Department of Large Animal Internal Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8129-2006
Glenn Van SteenkisteEquine Cardioteam, Department of Large Animal Internal Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0165-5215
Celia M MarrRossdales Equine Hospital, Newmarket, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5093-5694
Virginia B ReefDepartment of Clinical Studies New Bolton Center, University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine, Kennett Square, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7332-7918
Colin C SchwarzwaldEquine Department, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6095-5402
Katharyn J MitchellEquine Department, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5545-5630
Katarina NostellDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veteirnary Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3306-8397
Nora NogradiDubai Equine Hospital, Dubai, UAE.
Søren S NielsenDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jonas CarlsonDepartment of Cardiology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Pyotr G PlatonovDepartment of Cardiology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
University of Copenhagen · DKGhent University · BELund University · SEUniversity of Zurich · CHDubai Hospital · AERossdales Veterinary Surgeons · GBSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SEUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Det Frie Forskningsråd DFF-7017-00050Independent Research Fund Denmark DFF-7017-00050Research Foundation Flanders 1S56217NSpecial Research Fund Ghent University BOF.BAS.2018.0022.01The Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation 2200674
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe recurrence rate of atrial fibrillation (AF) in horses after cardioversion to sinus rhythm (SR) is relatively high. Atrial fibrillatory rate (AFR) derived from surface ECG is considered a biomarker for electrical remodelling and could potentially be used for the prediction of successful AF cardioversion and AF recurrence.

objectivesEvaluate if AFR was associated with successful treatment and could predict AF recurrence in horses. STUDY

designRetrospective multicentre study.

methodsElectrocardiograms (ECG) from horses with persistent AF admitted for cardioversion with either medical treatment (quinidine) or transvenous electrical cardioversion (TVEC) were included. Bipolar surface ECG recordings were analysed by spatiotemporal cancellation of QRST complexes and calculation of AFR from the remaining atrial signal. Kaplan-Meier survival curve and Cox regression analyses were performed to assess the relationship between AFR and the risk of AF recurrence.

resultsOf the 195 horses included, 74 received quinidine treatment and 121 were treated with TVEC. Ten horses did not cardiovert to SR after quinidine treatment and AFR was higher in these, compared with the horses that successfully cardioverted to SR (median [interquartile range]), (383 [367-422] vs 351 [332-389] fibrillations per minute (fpm), P < .01). Within the first 180 days following AF cardioversion, 12% of the quinidine and 34% of TVEC horses had AF recurrence. For the horses successfully cardioverted with TVEC, AFR above 380 fpm was significantly associated with AF recurrence (hazard ratio = 2.4, 95% confidence interval 1.2-4.8, P = .01). MAIN LIMITATIONS: The treatment groups were different and not randomly allocated, therefore the two treatments cannot be compared. Medical records and the follow-up strategy varied between the centres.

conclusionsHigh AFR is associated with failure of quinidine cardioversion and AF recurrence after successful TVEC. As a noninvasive marker that can be retrieved from surface ECG, AFR can be clinically useful in predicting the probability of responding to quinidine treatment as well as maintaining SR after electrical cardioversion.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationHorse DiseasesAnimalsElectric CountershockElectrocardiographyHeart AtriaHorsesQuinidineQuinidineAFRarrhythmiacardiologyECGelectrophysiologyhorsesurface electrocardiogram

Identifiers

PMID34957586
PMCPMC9787611
OpenAlexW4200517160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.