Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34957543›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2022

Provider perspectives on integrating family caregivers into patient care encounters.

Joan M Griffin, Catherine Riffin, Lauren R Bangerter, Karen Schaepe, Rachel D Havyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A Pilot Trial Evaluating Collaborative Healthcare Encounters With Caregivers: A Checklist-Based Intervention for Primary Care.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2025
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Support for Care Partners and Caregivers: 2023 Summit Session 5.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  12. A look at caregivers for community-living persons with dementia: Implications for the GUIDE model.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  13. Care Partner Perspectives on the Use of a Patient Portal Intervention to Promote Care Partner Identification in Dementia Care.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joan M GriffinDivision of Health Care Delivery Research and Kern Center for the Science of Healthcare Delivery Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8120-3229
Catherine RiffinDivision of Geriatrics & Palliative Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Lauren R BangerterOptum Labs, Minnetonka, Minnesota, USA.
Karen SchaepeKern Center for the Science of Healthcare Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Rachel D HavyerDepartment of Community Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Funding

Pilot CoreP30AG022845 · NIA · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI Manney Carrington Reid · 2003 to 2026
$15.2M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG022845
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine and compare health care provider perceptions for integrating family caregivers into patient encounters and other processes of care by medical specialty. DATA SOURCES/

settingData were from 19 interviews conducted in 2018, 10 with primary care or palliative care providers and nine with proceduralists or interventionists in practices located in Minnesota, Florida, and Arizona. STUDY

designThis was a qualitative study using data collected from one-on-one, semi-structured interviews with physicians. DATA COLLECTION: By using purposeful "maximum variation" sampling to capture differences between primary and palliative care providers and proceduralists/interventionists, data were collected, reviewed, coded, and then analyzed using inductive content analysis with a constant comparison approach. PRIMARY

findingsPrimary care providers described a lack of organizational and institutional resources to support caregivers. Accordingly, they were compelled to curb caregiver engagement in order to meet patients' clinical care needs within the time and workflow demands in encounters. Proceduralists and interventionists described the need to assess caregivers for suitability to provide care during intense periods of treatment. They reported having access to more formal organizational resources for supporting caregivers. Overall, providers described a paradox, where caregivers are seen as contributing value to patient encounters until they need training, education, or support to provide care, at which point they become burdensome and require more time and resources than are typically available.

conclusionsResults highlight how organizational constraints inhibit caregiver engagement in patient encounters and influence provider attitudes about engaging caregivers and assessing their unmet needs. Findings also provide insights into challenges across practice types for implementing state and federal laws that promote caregiver engagement.

Indexed as

CaregiversPalliative CareHealth PersonnelHumansPatient CareQualitative Researchfamily caregiversfamily-centered carefamily membershealth care deliveryhealth care policypatient-centered careprimary carequalitative methodsrelationship-centered carespecialty care

Identifiers

PMID34957543
PMCPMC9264458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.