Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34957437›Full record

ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2022

Influence of age on the effectiveness and duration of protection of Vaxzevria and CoronaVac vaccines: A population-based study.

Thiago Cerqueira-Silva, Vinicius de Araújo Oliveira, Viviane S Boaventura, Julia M Pescarini, Juracy Bertoldo Júnior, Tales Mota Machado, Renzo Flores-Ortiz, Gerson O Penna, Maria Yury Ichihara, Jacson Venâncio de Barros and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Thiago Cerqueira-SilvaLIB and LEITV Laboratories, Instituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fiocruz, Salvador, BA, Brazil.
Vinicius de Araújo OliveiraLIB and LEITV Laboratories, Instituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fiocruz, Salvador, BA, Brazil.
Viviane S BoaventuraLIB and LEITV Laboratories, Instituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fiocruz, Salvador, BA, Brazil.
Julia M PescariniCenter of Data and Knowledge Integration for Health (Cidacs), Fiocruz, Salvador, BA, Brazil.
Juracy Bertoldo JúniorUniversidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA), Salvador, BA, Brazil.
Tales Mota MachadoUniversidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Ouro Preto, MG, Brazil.
Renzo Flores-OrtizCenter of Data and Knowledge Integration for Health (Cidacs), Fiocruz, Salvador, BA, Brazil.
Gerson O PennaEscola Fiocruz de Governo, Núcleo de Medicina Tropical, Universidade de Brasília, Fiocruz Brasilia, Brasilia, DF, Brazil.
Maria Yury IchiharaCenter of Data and Knowledge Integration for Health (Cidacs), Fiocruz, Salvador, BA, Brazil.
Jacson Venâncio de BarrosDepartamento de Patologia da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo - FMUSP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Mauricio L BarretoUniversidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA), Salvador, BA, Brazil.
Guilherme Loureiro WerneckUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Manoel Barral-NettoLIB and LEITV Laboratories, Instituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fiocruz, Salvador, BA, Brazil.
Universidade Federal da Bahia · BRHospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BRLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversidade de Brasília · BRUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro · BRUniversidade Federal de Ouro Preto · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAging influences COVID-19 severity and response to vaccination, but previous vaccine effectiveness (VE) analyzes lack the power to evaluate its role in subgroups within the elderly age group. Here we analyzed the impact of age on viral vector and inactivated virus vaccines' effectiveness, the main platforms used in low- and middle-income countries.

methodsWe report a retrospective longitudinal study of 75,919,840 Brazilian vaccinees from January 18 to July 24, 2021, evaluating documented infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), COVID-19-related hospitalisation, ICU admission, and death. Negative binomial regression models adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics were used for VE estimation.

findingsThe overall analyzes of full vaccination showed VE against hospitalisation, ICU admission, and death of 91·4% (95%CI:90·1-92·5), 91·1% (95%CI:88·9-92·9) and 92·3% (95%CI:90·5-93·7) for Vaxzevria and 71·2% (95%CI:70·0-72·4), 72·2% (95%CI:70·2-74·0) and 73·7% (95%CI:72·1-75·2) for CoronaVac, respectively. VE for all outcomes is progressively lower with age. In fully-Vaxzevria-vaccinated individuals aged <60 years, VE against death was 96.5% (95%CI:82.1-99.3) versus 68·5% (95%CI:40·0-83·4) in those ≥90 years. Among fully-CoronaVac-vaccinated individuals, VE against death was 84.8% (95%CI:77.1-89.9) in those <60 years compared to 63.5 (95%CI 58.7-67.7) for vaccinees aged 80-89 years and 48·6%; (95%CI:35·0-59·3) for individuals aged ≥90 years. Post-vaccination daily cumulative incidence curves for all outcomes showed increased risk from younger to elder decades of life. There was no increase in the incidence of hospitalisation for individuals <60 years vaccinated during the same period as those aged ≥90 years.

interpretationAlthough both vaccines have been effective in protecting against infection, hospitalization and death; Vaxzevria and CoronaVac demonstrated high effectiveness against severe outcomes for individuals up to 79 years of age. Our results reinforce the idea that booster doses should be carefully considered in elders.

fundingThis study was partially supported by a donation from the "Fazer o bem faz bem" program.

Indexed as

CoronaVacCOVID-19EffectivenessVaccineVaxzevria

Identifiers

PMID34957437
PMCPMC8692070
OpenAlexW4200316526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.