ArticleCurrent opinion in biomedical engineering2021
Single Cell Technologies to Dissect Heterogenous Immune Cell Therapy Products.
Article in Current opinion in biomedical engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Evolving Landscape of Potency Assays.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023Article
- Leveraging high-resolution omics data for predicting responses and adverse events to immune checkpoint inhibitors.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Single cell tools have dramatically transformed the life sciences; concurrently, autologous and allogeneic immune cell therapies have recently entered the clinic. Here we discuss methods, applications, and considerations for single cell technologies in the context of immune cell manufacturing. Molecular heterogeneity can be profiled at the level of the genome, epigenome, transcriptome, proteome, metabolome, and antigen receptor repertoire, in isolation or in tandem through multi-omic approaches. Such data inform heterogeneity within cell products and can be linked to potency readouts and clinical data, with the ultimate goal of identifying Critical Quality Attributes to predict patient outcomes. Non-destructive approaches hold promise for monitoring cell state and analyzing the impacts of gene edits within engineered products. Destructive omics approaches could be combined with non-destructive technologies to predict therapeutic potency. These technologies are poised to redefine cell manufacturing toward rapid, cost-effective, and high-throughput methods to detect and respond to dynamic cell states.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.