Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34957350›Full record

ReviewApplied biological chemistry2021

Animal carcass burial management: implications for sustainable biochar use.

Meththika Vithanage, S S Mayakaduwage, Viraj Gunarathne, Anushka Upamali Rajapaksha, Mahtab Ahmad, Adel Abduljabbar, Adel Usman, Mohammad I Al-Wabel, James A Ippolito, Yong Sik Ok

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Applied biological chemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Meththika VithanageEcosphere Resilience Research Centre, Faculty of Applied Sciences, University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Nugegoda, 10250 Sri Lanka.
S S MayakaduwageEcosphere Resilience Research Centre, Faculty of Applied Sciences, University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Nugegoda, 10250 Sri Lanka.
Viraj GunarathneEcosphere Resilience Research Centre, Faculty of Applied Sciences, University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Nugegoda, 10250 Sri Lanka.
Anushka Upamali RajapakshaEcosphere Resilience Research Centre, Faculty of Applied Sciences, University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Nugegoda, 10250 Sri Lanka.
Mahtab AhmadDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, 45320 Pakistan.
Adel AbduljabbarIndustrial Psychology, College of Education, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Adel UsmanSoil Sciences Department, College of Food and Agricultural Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammad I Al-WabelSoil Sciences Department, College of Food and Agricultural Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
James A IppolitoDepartment of Soil and Crop Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO USA.
Yong Sik OkKorea Biochar Research Center, APRU Sustainable Waste Management and Division of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, 02841 South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review focuses on existing technologies for carcass and corpse disposal and potential alternative treatment strategies. Furthermore, key issues related to these treatments (e.g., carcass and corpse disposal events, available methods, performances, and limitations) are addressed in conjunction with associated environmental impacts. Simultaneously, various treatment technologies have been evaluated to provide insights into the adsorptive removal of specific pollutants derived from carcass disposal and management. In this regard, it has been proposed that a low-cost pollutant sorbent may be utilized, namely, biochar. Biochar has demonstrated the ability to remove (in)organic pollutants and excess nutrients from soils and waters; thus, we identify possible biochar uses for soil and water remediation at carcass and corpse disposal sites. To date, however, little emphasis has been placed on potential biochar use to manage such disposal sites. We highlight the need for strategic efforts to accurately assess biochar effectiveness when applied towards the remediation of complex pollutants produced and circulated within carcass and corpse burial systems.

Indexed as

BiocharCarcass burialHuman corpsesPandemicSoil amendment

Identifiers

PMID34957350
PMCPMC8693145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.