ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2021
Mitral Valve Atlas for Artificial Intelligence Predictions of MitraClip Intervention Outcomes.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Morphological Variation in the Human Mitral Valve Using Statistical Shape Modelling.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Generative deep learning for foundational video translation in ultrasound.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Structural Heart Disease.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026Review
- Leaflet Lengths and Commissural Dimensions as the Primary Determinants of Orifice Area in Mitral Regurgitation: A Sobol Sensitivity Analysis.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Advanced Computer Simulation Based on Cardiac Imaging in Planning of Structural Heart Disease Interventions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- From Bytes to Beats: Overcoming Conceptual and Implementation Challenges for AI in Cardiovascular Care.Circulation · 2025Article
- Transcatheter Mitral Valve Intervention: Current and Future Role of Multimodality Imaging for Device Selection and Periprocedural Guidance.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- Artificial intelligence in heart valve disease: diagnosis, innovation and treatment. A state-of-the-art review.The British journal of cardiology · 2024Article
- Patient-Specific Quantitative In-Vivo Assessment of Human Mitral Valve Leaflet Strain Before and After MitraClip Repair.Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2023Article
- Machine learning used for simulation of MitraClip intervention: A proof-of-concept study.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- Looking towards the future: patient-specific computational modeling to optimize outcomes for transcatheter mitral valve repair.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- The evolution of technical prerequisites and local boundary conditions for optimization of mitral valve interventions-Emphasis on skills development and institutional risk performance.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- A Simulation Study of the Effects of Number and Location of MitraClips on Mitral Regurgitation.JACC. Advances · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Severe mitral regurgitation (MR) is a cardiac disease that can lead to fatal consequences. MitraClip (MC) intervention is a percutaneous procedure whereby the mitral valve (MV) leaflets are connected along the edge using MCs. The outcomes of the MC intervention are not known in advance, i.e., the outcomes are quite variable. Artificial intelligence (AI) can be used to guide the cardiologist in selecting optimal MC scenarios. In this study, we describe an atlas of shapes as well as different scenarios for MC implantation for such an AI analysis. We generated the MV geometrical data from three different sources. First, the patients' 3-dimensional echo images were used. The pixel data from six key points were obtained from three views of the echo images. Using PyGem, an open-source morphing library in Python, these coordinates were used to create the geometry by morphing a template geometry. Second, the dimensions of the MV, from the literature were used to create data. Third, we used machine learning methods, principal component analysis, and generative adversarial networks to generate more shapes. We used the finite element (FE) software ABAQUS to simulate smoothed particle hydrodynamics in different scenarios for MC intervention. The MR and stresses in the leaflets were post-processed. Our physics-based FE models simulated the outcomes of MC intervention for different scenarios. The MR and stresses in the leaflets were computed by the FE models for a single clip at different locations as well as two and three clips. Results from FE simulations showed that the location and number of MCs affect subsequent residual MR, and that leaflet stresses do not follow a simple pattern. Furthermore, FE models need several hours to provide the results, and they are not applicable for clinical usage where the predicted outcomes of MC therapy are needed in real-time. In this study, we generated the required dataset for the AI models which can provide the results in a matter of seconds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.