Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34957251›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2021

Mitral Valve Atlas for Artificial Intelligence Predictions of MitraClip Intervention Outcomes.

Yaghoub Dabiri, Jiang Yao, Vaikom S Mahadevan, Daniel Gruber, Rima Arnaout, Wolfgang Gentzsch, Julius M Guccione, Ghassan S Kassab

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Structural Heart Disease.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Yaghoub Dabiri3DT Holdings LLC, San Diego, CA, United States.
Jiang YaoDassault Systemes Simulia Corp, Johnston, RI, United States.
Vaikom S MahadevanDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Daniel GruberThe UberCloud, Sunnyvale, CA, United States.
Rima ArnaoutDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Wolfgang GentzschThe UberCloud, Sunnyvale, CA, United States.
Julius M GuccioneDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Ghassan S KassabDepartment of Medicine, California Medical Innovations Institute, San Diego, CA, United States.
University of California, San Francisco · US3DT Holdings (United States) · USCalifornia Medical Innovations Institute · USDassault Systèmes (United States) · USUniversity of California System · US

Funding

Toward efficient performance for deep learning on medical imagingR01HL150394 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Rima Arnaout · 2020 to 2026
$6.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL150394
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe mitral regurgitation (MR) is a cardiac disease that can lead to fatal consequences. MitraClip (MC) intervention is a percutaneous procedure whereby the mitral valve (MV) leaflets are connected along the edge using MCs. The outcomes of the MC intervention are not known in advance, i.e., the outcomes are quite variable. Artificial intelligence (AI) can be used to guide the cardiologist in selecting optimal MC scenarios. In this study, we describe an atlas of shapes as well as different scenarios for MC implantation for such an AI analysis. We generated the MV geometrical data from three different sources. First, the patients' 3-dimensional echo images were used. The pixel data from six key points were obtained from three views of the echo images. Using PyGem, an open-source morphing library in Python, these coordinates were used to create the geometry by morphing a template geometry. Second, the dimensions of the MV, from the literature were used to create data. Third, we used machine learning methods, principal component analysis, and generative adversarial networks to generate more shapes. We used the finite element (FE) software ABAQUS to simulate smoothed particle hydrodynamics in different scenarios for MC intervention. The MR and stresses in the leaflets were post-processed. Our physics-based FE models simulated the outcomes of MC intervention for different scenarios. The MR and stresses in the leaflets were computed by the FE models for a single clip at different locations as well as two and three clips. Results from FE simulations showed that the location and number of MCs affect subsequent residual MR, and that leaflet stresses do not follow a simple pattern. Furthermore, FE models need several hours to provide the results, and they are not applicable for clinical usage where the predicted outcomes of MC therapy are needed in real-time. In this study, we generated the required dataset for the AI models which can provide the results in a matter of seconds.

Indexed as

cardiac imagingfinite element methodMitraClipmitral valveprincipal component analysis

Identifiers

PMID34957251
PMCPMC8709129
OpenAlexW4200389822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.