Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34957230›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2021

Implementing Machine Learning in Interventional Cardiology: The Benefits Are Worth the Trouble.

Walid Ben Ali, Ahmad Pesaranghader, Robert Avram, Pavel Overtchouk, Nils Perrin, Stéphane Laffite, Raymond Cartier, Reda Ibrahim, Thomas Modine, Julie G Hussin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Artificial Intelligence - Advisory or Adversary?Interventional cardiology (London, England) · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Big Data in Cardiology: State-of-Art and Future Prospects.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Walid Ben AliService Médico-Chirurgical, Valvulopathies-Chirurgie Cardiaque-Cardiologie Interventionelle Structurelle, Hôpital Cardiologique de Haut Lévèque, Bordeaux, France.
Ahmad PesaranghaderFaculty of Medicine, Research Center, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Robert AvramFaculty of Medicine, Research Center, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Pavel OvertchoukInterventional Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire de Lille (CHRU de Lille), Lille, France.
Nils PerrinStructural Heart Program and Interventional Cardiology, Université de Montréal, Montreal Heart Institute, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Stéphane LaffiteService Médico-Chirurgical, Valvulopathies-Chirurgie Cardiaque-Cardiologie Interventionelle Structurelle, Hôpital Cardiologique de Haut Lévèque, Bordeaux, France.
Raymond CartierStructural Heart Program and Interventional Cardiology, Université de Montréal, Montreal Heart Institute, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Reda IbrahimStructural Heart Program and Interventional Cardiology, Université de Montréal, Montreal Heart Institute, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Thomas ModineService Médico-Chirurgical, Valvulopathies-Chirurgie Cardiaque-Cardiologie Interventionelle Structurelle, Hôpital Cardiologique de Haut Lévèque, Bordeaux, France.
Julie G HussinFaculty of Medicine, Research Center, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Driven by recent innovations and technological progress, the increasing quality and amount of biomedical data coupled with the advances in computing power allowed for much progress in artificial intelligence (AI) approaches for health and biomedical research. In interventional cardiology, the hope is for AI to provide automated analysis and deeper interpretation of data from electrocardiography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and electronic health records, among others. Furthermore, high-performance predictive models supporting decision-making hold the potential to improve safety, diagnostic and prognostic prediction in patients undergoing interventional cardiology procedures. These applications include robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention procedures and automatic assessment of coronary stenosis during diagnostic coronary angiograms. Machine learning (ML) has been used in these innovations that have improved the field of interventional cardiology, and more recently, deep Learning (DL) has emerged as one of the most successful branches of ML in many applications. It remains to be seen if DL approaches will have a major impact on current and future practice. DL-based predictive systems also have several limitations, including lack of interpretability and lack of generalizability due to cohort heterogeneity and low sample sizes. There are also challenges for the clinical implementation of these systems, such as ethical limits and data privacy. This review is intended to bring the attention of health practitioners and interventional cardiologists to the broad and helpful applications of ML and DL algorithms to date in the field. Their implementation challenges in daily practice and future applications in the field of interventional cardiology are also discussed.

Indexed as

cardiologydeep learninginterventional cardiologyneural networksprognosis

Identifiers

PMID34957230
PMCPMC8692711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.