ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2021
Implementing Machine Learning in Interventional Cardiology: The Benefits Are Worth the Trouble.
Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transformer-DAPT: AI-based dynamic assessment of ischemic and bleeding risks in patients on DAPT following PCI.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Medicine: A Giant Step in Personalized Medicine?Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Harnessing Artificial Intelligence in Interventional Cardiology: A Systematic Review of Current Applications.Cureus · 2025Review
- Review
- Volatilome and machine learning in ischemic heart disease: Current challenges and future perspectives.World journal of cardiology · 2025Article
- Global trends of delayed graft function in kidney transplantation from 2013 to 2023: a bibliometric analysis.Renal failure · 2024Review
- Review
- Importance of hospital and clinical factors for early mortality in Takotsubo syndrome: Insights from the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024Article
- Contrastive learning with transformer for adverse endpoint prediction in patients on DAPT post-coronary stent implantation.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Advancements in artificial intelligence-driven techniques for interventional cardiology.Cardiology journal · 2024Review
- Predicting in-hospital mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement using administrative data and machine learning.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Identifying Predictors of Psychological Problems Among Adolescents With Congenital Heart Disease for Referral to Psychological Care: A Pilot Study.CJC pediatric and congenital heart disease · 2023Article
- Artificial Intelligence - Advisory or Adversary?Interventional cardiology (London, England) · 2023Article
- Artificial Intelligence Implementation in Healthcare: A Theory-Based Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Learning dynamic treatment strategies for coronary heart diseases by artificial intelligence: real-world data-driven study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022Article
- Real-World and Regulatory Perspectives of Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Imaging.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Big Data in Cardiology: State-of-Art and Future Prospects.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Driven by recent innovations and technological progress, the increasing quality and amount of biomedical data coupled with the advances in computing power allowed for much progress in artificial intelligence (AI) approaches for health and biomedical research. In interventional cardiology, the hope is for AI to provide automated analysis and deeper interpretation of data from electrocardiography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and electronic health records, among others. Furthermore, high-performance predictive models supporting decision-making hold the potential to improve safety, diagnostic and prognostic prediction in patients undergoing interventional cardiology procedures. These applications include robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention procedures and automatic assessment of coronary stenosis during diagnostic coronary angiograms. Machine learning (ML) has been used in these innovations that have improved the field of interventional cardiology, and more recently, deep Learning (DL) has emerged as one of the most successful branches of ML in many applications. It remains to be seen if DL approaches will have a major impact on current and future practice. DL-based predictive systems also have several limitations, including lack of interpretability and lack of generalizability due to cohort heterogeneity and low sample sizes. There are also challenges for the clinical implementation of these systems, such as ethical limits and data privacy. This review is intended to bring the attention of health practitioners and interventional cardiologists to the broad and helpful applications of ML and DL algorithms to date in the field. Their implementation challenges in daily practice and future applications in the field of interventional cardiology are also discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.