Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34957158›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2021

Extension of Indication for Authorised Oncology Products in the European Union: A Joint Effort of Multiple Stakeholders.

Jorn Mulder, Robin Verjans, Ciska Verbaanderd, Elias Pean, Just Weemers, Hubert G M Leufkens, Francesco Pignatti, Anthonius de Boer, Emile E Voest, Violeta V Stoyanova-Beninska and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. [Challenges of Investigator-initiated Clinical Trials to Support 
the New Drug Development].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jorn MulderDutch Medicines Evaluation Board, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Robin VerjansLygature, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Ciska VerbaanderdEuropean Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Elias PeanEuropean Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Just WeemersJanssen Biologics BV, Leiden, Netherlands.
Hubert G M LeufkensUtrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Francesco PignattiEuropean Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Anthonius de BoerDutch Medicines Evaluation Board, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Emile E VoestDepartment of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Violeta V Stoyanova-BeninskaDutch Medicines Evaluation Board, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Anna M G PasmooijDutch Medicines Evaluation Board, Utrecht, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After marketing authorisation, the development of a medicinal product often continues with studies investigating new therapeutic indications. Positive results can potentially lead to changes to the terms of the marketing authorisation, such as an extension of therapeutic indication(s). These studies can be initiated and sponsored by the marketing authorisation holder (MAH) or by others. When results from an investigator-initiated trial suggest that an authorised medicinal product is safe and effective for a new therapeutic indication, physicians may want to treat their patients with this medicinal product. In such a situation, it is desirable to extend the therapeutic indication(s)

Indexed as

anti-cancer medicinal productsEuropean Medicines Agencyextension of therapeutic indicationinvestigator-initiated trialsregulatory approval

Identifiers

PMID34957158
PMCPMC8695872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.