Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34956974›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2021

Impact of Intrapartum Antibiotic Prophylaxis on Offspring Microbiota.

S Prescott, C Dreisbach, K Baumgartel, R Koerner, A Gyamfi, M Canellas, A St Fleur, W A Henderson, G Trinchieri

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Vaccination in pregnancy to protect the newborn.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

S PrescottLaboratory of Integrative Immunology, Center for Cancer Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
C DreisbachData Science Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.
K BaumgartelCollege of Nursing, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States.
R KoernerCollege of Nursing, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States.
A GyamfiSchool of Nursing, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States.
M CanellasCollege of Nursing, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States.
A St FleurCollege of Nursing, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States.
W A HendersonSchool of Nursing, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States.
G TrinchieriLaboratory of Integrative Immunology, Center for Cancer Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
University of South Florida · USUniversity of Connecticut · USCenter for Cancer Research · USColumbia University · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infants are born into a world filled with microbes and must adapt without undue immune response while exploiting the microbiota's ability to produce otherwise unavailable nutrients. The process by which humans and microbes establish this relationship has only recently begun to be studied with the aid of genomic methods. Nearly half of all pregnant women receive antibiotics during gestation to prevent maternal and neonatal infection. Though this has been largely successful in reducing early-onset sepsis, we have yet to understand the long-term consequences of antibiotic administration during gestation to developing infants. Studies involving antibiotic use in infants suggest that dysbiosis during this period is associated with increased obesity, allergy, autoimmunity, and chronic diseases in adulthood, however, research around the limited doses of intravenous antibiotics used for intrapartum prophylaxis is limited. In this mini review, we focused on the state of the science regarding the effects of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis on the newborn microbial colonization process. Although, the literature indicates that there is wide variety in the specific bacteria that colonize infants from birth, limited parenteral antibiotic administration prior to delivery consistently affects the microbiota of infants by decreasing bacteria in the phylum

Indexed as

IAPintrapartum antibioticsmicrobiotaneonatal microbiomeoffspring dysbiosispregnancy

Identifiers

PMID34956974
PMCPMC8703107
OpenAlexW4200037043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.