Article3 Biotech2022
A stepwise mutagenesis approach using histidine and acidic amino acid to engineer highly pH-dependent protein switches.
Article in 3 Biotech, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Computational design of pH-sensitive binders.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Robust Prediction of Relative Binding Energies for Protein-Protein Complex Mutations Using Free Energy Perturbation Calculations.Journal of molecular biology · 2024Article
- Understanding the Specific Implications of Amino Acids in the Antibody Development.The protein journal · 2024Review
- Robust prediction of relative binding energies for protein-protein complex mutations using free energy perturbation calculations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Treatment efficacy of low-dose 5-fluorouracil with ultrasound in mediating 5-fluorouracil-loaded microbubble cavitation in head and neck cancer.Drug delivery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antibody-based drugs can be highly toxic, because they target normal tissue as well as tumor tissue. The pH value of the extracellular microenvironments around tumor tissues is lower than that of normal tissues. Therefore, antibodies that engage in pH-dependent binding at slightly acidic pH are crucial for improving the safety of antibody-based drugs. Thus, we implemented a stepwise mutagenesis approach to engineering pH-dependent antibodies capable of selective binding in the acidic microenvironment in this study. The first step involved single-residue histidine scanning mutagenesis of the antibody's complementarity-determining regions to prescreen for pH-dependent mutants and identify ionizable sensitive hot-spot residues that could be substituted by acidic amino acids to obtain pH-dependent antibodies. The second step involved single-acidic amino acid residue substitutions of the identified residues and the assessment of pH-dependent binding. We identified six ionizable sensitive hot-spot residues using single-histidine scanning mutagenesis. Nine pH-dependent antibodies were isolated using single-acidic amino acid residue mutagenesis at the six hot-spot residue positions. Relative to wild-type anti-CEA chimera antibody, the binding selectivity of the best performing mutant was improved by approximately 32-fold according to ELISA and by tenfold according to FACS assay. The mutant had a high affinity in the pH range of 5.5-6.0. This study supports the development of pH-dependent protein switches and increases our understanding of the role of ionizable residues in protein interfaces. The stepwise mutagenesis approach is rapid, general, and robust and is expected to produce pH-sensitive protein affinity reagents for various applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.