Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34956707›Full record

ArticleMedical science educator2021

Reading and Study Habits of Medical Students on Clerkships and Performance Outcomes: a Multi-institutional Study.

Terry Kind, Doreen M Olvet, Gino Farina, Loren Kenda, Stephanie L Sarandos, April J Yasunaga, Janet A Jokela, Richard J Simons

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science educator, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Terry KindDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's National Hospital, 111 Michigan Ave, Washington, NW 20010 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3017-5683
Doreen M OlvetDepartment of Science Education, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9427-3787
Gino FarinaDepartment of Emergency Medicine and Science Education, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4993-0738
Loren KendaOffice of Evaluation, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC USA.
Stephanie L SarandosOffice of Evaluation, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC USA.
April J YasunagaDepartment of Medicine, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL USA.
Janet A JokelaDepartment of Medicine, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4324-4809
Richard J SimonsDepartment of Medicine, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo describe medical students' reading habits and resources used during clinical clerkships, and to assess whether these are associated with performance outcomes.

methodAuthors administered a cross-sectional survey to medical students at 3 schools midway through the clerkship year. Closed and open-ended questions focused on resources used to read and learn during the most recent clerkship, time spent and purpose for using these resources, influencers on study habits, and barriers. A multiple regression model was used to predict performance outcomes.

resultsOverall response rate was 53% (158/293). Students spent most of their time studying for clerkship exams and rated question banks and board review books as most useful for exam preparation. Sixty-seven percent used textbooks (including pocket-size). For patient care, online databases and pocket-sized textbooks were rated most useful. The main barrier to reading was time. Eighty percent of students ranked classmates/senior students as most influential regarding recommended resources. Hours spent reading for exams was the only significant predictor of USMLE Step 2 scores related to study habits. The predominant advice offered to future students was to read.

conclusionsThese findings can help inform students and educational leadership about resources students use, how they use them, and links to performance outcomes, in an effort to guide them on maximizing learning on busy clerkships. With peers being most influential, it is important not only to provide time to help students build strong reading and study habits early, but also to guide them towards reliable resources, so they will recommend useful information to others.

Indexed as

Clinical clerkshipsMedical studentsReadingStudying

Identifiers

PMID34956707
PMCPMC8651945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.