ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021
Comprehensive expectoration nursing in elderly patients with pulmonary infection and its influence on respiratory function.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07484178 (Effectiveness of Nurse-Led Interventions on Respiratory Outcomes in Hospitalized Patients With Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effectiveness of Nurse-Led Interventions on Respiratory Outcomes in Hospitalized Patients With Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Control Trial
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of comprehensive nursing in stabilizing perioperative hemodynamic indicators and reducing complications in patients under general anesthesia.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Efficacy of comprehensive nursing in patients with pneumoconiosis and its influence on quality of life.American journal of translational research · 2022Article
- Effect of comprehensive nursing intervention in children with respiratory failure.American journal of translational research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the effect of comprehensive expectoration nursing in elderly patients with pulmonary infection and its influence on respiratory function.
methodsClinical data of 88 elderly patients with pulmonary infection treated in our hospital from March 2018 to May 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. During treatment, 40 patients receiving conventional nursing mode were included in the control group (CG), and 48 with comprehensive expectoration nursing were included in the observation group (OG). The number of patients with spontaneous expectoration, assisted expectoration and sputum aspiration one week after nursing, the related indices of blood oxygen and lung function before and after nursing, and the sputum excretion volume, respiratory rate and neutrophils one week after nursing, were compared between the two groups. The hospitalization time, expenses, patients' quality of life after nursing and nursing satisfaction were also compared between the two groups.
resultsCompared with the CG, the hospitalization time and expenses of patients in OG were obviously lower, while the effective rate of sputum excretion was obviously higher after nursing. The blood oxygen, lung function, sputum excretion volume, respiratory rate and neutrophil recovery in OG were obviously better than those in CG. Meanwhile, compared with the CG, the quality of life and nursing satisfaction of patients in OG were obviously higher after nursing.
conclusionComprehensive expectoration nursing in elderly patients with pulmonary infection has better effect and is able to effectively improve their respiratory function, quality of life and nursing satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34956512PMC8661149W4206887109What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.