ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021
A predictive model for the diagnosis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease based on an integrated machine learning method.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Applications of machine learning in the diagnosis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Pooled it
- The effect of longitudinal trajectories of triglyceride-glucose index on the incident metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Hidden in the Fat: Unpacking the Metabolic Tango Between Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease and Metabolic Syndrome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Machine-Learning Application for Predicting Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease Using Laboratory and Body Composition Indicators.Archives of Iranian medicine · 2024Article
- A Machine Learning Model to Predict Risk for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients With Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease.Gastro hep advances · 2024Article
- Advancing non-alcoholic fatty liver disease prediction: a comprehensive machine learning approach integrating SHAP interpretability and multi-cohort validation.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
- A dynamic machine learning model for prediction of NAFLD in a health checkup population: A longitudinal study.Heliyon · 2023Article
- The application of risk models based on machine learning to predict endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer in patients with endometriosis.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2022Article
- A Deep Learning-Based Model for Predicting Abnormal Liver Function in Workers in the Automotive Manufacturing Industry: A Cross-Sectional Survey in Chongqing, China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diagnostic markers for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) are still needed for screening individuals at risk. In recent years, the machine learning method was used to search for the diagnostic markers of multiple diseases. In this study, we developed and validated a machine learning model to diagnose NAFLD using laboratory indicators. NAFLD patients and non-NAFLD controls were recruited in the training and validation cohorts. The laboratory indicators of the participants in the training cohort were collected, and six indicators including alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase (ALT/AST), white blood cells (WBC), alpha-L-fucosidase (AFU), hemoglobin (Hb), triglycerides (TG) and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) were screened out with higher weights by an integrate machine learning method. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) for the selected indicators using logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF) and support vector machine (SVM) were 0.814, 0.837 and 0.810, respectively. Then the binary logistic regression was used to construct the predictive model. What's more, the AUROC of the predicted model was 0.732 in the validation cohort of patients with NAFLD. And the combined AUROC of the six parameters was 0.716 in the mouse model fed with high-fat diet (HFD). In summary, we created a predictive model with six laboratory indicators for the diagnosis of NAFLD based on the machine learning method, which has the potential value for the diagnosis of the NAFLD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34956485PMC8661138What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.