ReviewAmerican journal of translational research2021
The efficacy and safety of Sacubitril/Valsartan in the treatment of chronic heart failure: a meta-analysis.
Review in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety profile of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors in the management of heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Heart failure reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Detection of muscular system adverse reaction signals in sacubitril/valsartan treatment combined with statins.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Sacubitril/valsartan for cardioprotection in breast cancer (MAINSTREAM): design and rationale of the randomized trial.ESC heart failure · 2023Article
- Effects of elevation of ANP and its deficiency on cardiorenal function.JCI insight · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveA meta-analysis of the studies involving Sacubitril/Valsartan in chronic heart failure was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of Sacubitril/Valsartan with traditional drug therapy in chronic heart failure.
methodsWe searched databases from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and clinicaltrials.gov for studies published between 2010 and 2020 that reported efficacy and safety following Sacubitril/Valsartan administration.
resultsTen studies enrolling 1689 patients were included. Sacubitril/Valsartan outperformed traditional medicine (especially the Non-ARNI group) in terms of blood pressure, biomarkers and cardiac reverse remodeling indices, with striking changes in left ventricular ejection fraction, systolic blood pressure. Sacubitril/Valsartan showed significant benefit in renal function in patients with chronic heart failure.
conclusionsCompared with traditional drugs, Sacubitril/Valsartan significantly improved echocardiography, vital signs and biomarkers of patients with chronic heart failure, and reduced the incidence of hyperkalemia, renal dysfunction and other adverse reactions. Further large sample trials are needed in the future to determine the long-term effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan on efficacy and safety in patients with chronic heart failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34956440PMC8661232W4206857105What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.