ArticleInternational journal of microbiology2021
Prevalence of Shiga Toxin-Producing
Article in International journal of microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Colistin- and cefotaxime-resistant Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) in buffalo meat.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Shiga Toxin-ProducingMicroorganisms · 2025Review
- Shiga Toxin: Emerging Producer Strains, Prophylactic Approaches, and Application in Cancer Therapy.Journal of cancer prevention · 2024Review
- Antimicrobial Resistance in DiverseAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Cefotaxime-, Ciprofloxacin-, and Extensively Drug-ResistantFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The Importance of the Slaughterhouse in Surveilling Animal and Public Health: A Systematic Review.Veterinary sciences · 2023Review
- Transforming Shiga toxin-producingFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Knowledge, Hygienic Practices, and Toxi-Infectious Risks Associated with Ready-to-Eat Gbeli: A Particular Chip Derived from Cassava (BioMed research international · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aims of the current study are the identification of O157 and non-O157 Shiga Toxin-Producing MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 110 beef samples were collected from the depth of the rump of cattle slaughtered at Hamadan industrial slaughterhouse. After detection of
resultsAmong 110 collected beef samples, 77 (70%) were positive for
conclusionThe isolation of different clones STECs from beef and the presence of antibiotic-resistant isolates indicate that more attention should be paid to the hygiene of slaughterhouses.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.