Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34956222›Full record

Trial reportFrontiers in immunology2021

Endogenous Antibody Responses to SARS-CoV-2 in Patients With Mild or Moderate COVID-19 Who Received Bamlanivimab Alone or Bamlanivimab and Etesevimab Together.

Lin Zhang, Josh Poorbaugh, Michael Dougan, Peter Chen, Robert L Gottlieb, Gregory Huhn, Stephanie Beasley, Montanea Daniels, Thi Ngoc Vy Trinh, Melissa Crisp and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Frontiers in immunology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Spike-specific T-cell responses in patients with COVID-19 successfully treated with neutralizing monoclonal antibodies against SARS-CoV-2.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2022
    Article
  14. Immune-based therapeutic approaches in COVID-19.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Lin ZhangLilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Josh PoorbaughLilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Michael DouganMassachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Peter ChenDepartment of Medicine, Women's Guild Lung Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Robert L GottliebDepartment of Internal Medicine, Center for Advanced Heart and Lung Disease, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States.
Gregory HuhnThe Ruth M. Rothstein CORE Center, Cook County Health, Chicago, IL, United States.
Stephanie BeasleyLilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Montanea DanielsLilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Thi Ngoc Vy TrinhLilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Melissa CrispLilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Joshua Joaquin FreitasLilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Peter VaillancourtLilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Dipak R PatelLilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Ajay NirulaLilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Nicole L KallewaardLilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Richard E HiggsLilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Robert J BenschopLilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Eli Lilly (United States) · USBaylor Medical Center at Garland · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USRuth M. Rothstein CORE Center · US

Funding

Fungal dysbiosis regulation of post-influenza bacterial pneumoniaR01HL155759 · NHLBI · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI CHEN, PETER · 2021 to 2024
$2.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL155759
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to SARS-CoV-2 are clinically efficacious when administered early, decreasing hospitalization and mortality in patients with mild or moderate COVID-19. We investigated the effects of receiving mAbs (bamlanivimab alone and bamlanivimab and etesevimab together) after SARS-CoV-2 infection on the endogenous immune response. Methods: Longitudinal serum samples were collected from patients with mild or moderate COVID-19 in the BLAZE-1 trial who received placebo (n=153), bamlanivimab alone [700 mg (n=100), 2800 mg (n=106), or 7000 mg (n=98)], or bamlanivimab (2800 mg) and etesevimab (2800 mg) together (n=111). A multiplex Luminex serology assay measured antibody titers against SARS-CoV-2 antigens, including SARS-CoV-2 protein variants that evade bamlanivimab or etesevimab binding, and SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus neutralization assays were performed. Results: The antibody response in patients who received placebo or mAbs had a broad specificity. Titer change from baseline against a receptor-binding domain mutant (Spike-RBD E484Q), as well as N-terminal domain (Spike-NTD) and nucleocapsid protein (NCP) epitopes were 1.4 to 4.1 fold lower at day 15-85 in mAb recipients compared with placebo. Neutralizing activity of day 29 sera from bamlanivimab monotherapy cohorts against both spike E484Q and beta variant (B.1.351) were slightly reduced compared with placebo (by a factor of 3.1, p=0.001, and 2.9, p=0.002, respectively). Early viral load correlated with the subsequent antibody titers of the native, unmodified humoral response (p<0.0001 at Day 15, 29, 60 and 85 for full-length spike). Conclusions: Patients with mild or moderate COVID-19 treated with mAbs develop a wide breadth of antigenic responses to SARS-CoV-2. Small reductions in titers and neutralizing activity, potentially due to a decrease in viral load following mAb treatment, suggest minimal impact of mAb treatment on the endogenous immune response.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentAdultAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralAntiviral AgentsCOVID-19Drug CombinationsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2Antibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralAntiviral Agentsbamlanivimabbamlanivimab and etesevimab drug combinationDrug CombinationsantibodiesbamlanivimabCOVID-19etesevimabimmune responseserology

Identifiers

PMID34956222
PMCPMC8697104
OpenAlexW4200330404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.