Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34956191›Full record

Trial reportFrontiers in immunology2021

Comparison of Female Genital Tract Cytokine and Microbiota Signatures Induced by Initiation of Intramuscular DMPA and NET-EN Hormonal Contraceptives - a Prospective Cohort Analysis.

Smritee Dabee, Ramla F Tanko, Bryan P Brown, Rubina Bunjun, Christina Balle, Colin Feng, Iyaloo N Konstantinus, Shameem Z Jaumdally, Maricianah Onono, Gonasagrie Nair and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Frontiers in immunology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Smritee DabeeCenter for Global Infectious Disease, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States.
Ramla F TankoInstitute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine (IDM), University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Bryan P BrownCenter for Global Infectious Disease, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States.
Rubina BunjunInstitute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine (IDM), University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Christina BalleInstitute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine (IDM), University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Colin FengCenter for Global Infectious Disease, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States.
Iyaloo N KonstantinusNamibia Institute of Pathology, Windhoek, Namibia.
Shameem Z JaumdallyInstitute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine (IDM), University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Maricianah OnonoKenya Medical Research Institute, Kisumu, Kenya.
Gonasagrie NairDesmond Tutu HIV Centre, Cape Town, South Africa.
Thesla Palanee-PhillipsWits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Katherine GillDesmond Tutu HIV Centre, Cape Town, South Africa.
Jared M BaetenDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Linda-Gail BekkerDesmond Tutu HIV Centre, Cape Town, South Africa.
Jo-Ann S PassmoreInstitute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine (IDM), University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Renee HeffronDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Heather B JaspanCenter for Global Infectious Disease, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States.
Anna-Ursula HappelInstitute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine (IDM), University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
University of Cape Town · ZAInfectious Disease Research Institute · USDesmond Tutu HIV Foundation · ZAUniversity of Washington · USCentre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa · ZAKenya Medical Research Institute · KENamibia Institute of Pathology · NAUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZA

Funding

Effects of Hormonal Contraceptives on Genital Immunity and HIV SusceptibilityR01HD089831 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI HEFFRON, RENEE A., JASPAN, HEATHER BERYL · 2016 to 2020
$3.0M
Hormone induced mucosal susceptibility and HIV risk in South African adolescentsR01HD083040 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN · PI JASPAN, HEATHER BERYL, PASSMORE, JO-ANN SHELLEY · 2015 to 2019
$1.9M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD083040NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD089831
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cervicovaginal inflammation, bacterial microbiota and hormonal contraceptives all influence sexual and reproductive health. To date, the effects of intramuscular depo-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-IM) versus injectable norethisterone enanthate (NET-EN) on vaginal microbiota or cytokines have not been compared back-to-back, although Methods: We collected socio-demographic characteristics and vaginal samples from women initiating DMPA-IM (ECHO Trial; n = 53) and NET-EN (UChoose Trial; n = 44) at baseline and after two consecutive injections to assess cytokine concentrations by Luminex, vaginal microbiota by 16S rRNA gene sequencing, STIs, bacterial vaginosis (BV) and candidiasis. Results: Cytokine concentrations did not change significantly after initiating DMPA-IM or NET-EN, although NET-EN versus DMPA-IM-associated profiles were distinct. While the abundance of bacterial taxa associated with optimal and non-optimal microbiota fluctuated with DMPA-IM use, overall community composition did not significantly change with either contraceptive. HSV-2 serology, chlamydial infection, gonorrhoea and candidiasis did not influence the associations between contraceptive type and cervicovaginal cytokines or microbiota. Conclusions: Both DMPA-IM and NET-EN use did not lead to broad inflammatory or microbiota changes in the female genital tract of sub-Saharan African women. This suggests that NET-EN is likely a viable option for contraception in African women at high risk of BV and STIs.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAfrica South of the SaharaContraceptive Agents, FemaleContraceptive Agents, HormonalCross-Over StudiesCytokinesFemaleGenitalia, FemaleHumansInjections, IntramuscularMedroxyprogesterone AcetateMicrobiotaNorethindroneProspective StudiesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SContraceptive Agents, FemaleContraceptive Agents, HormonalCytokinesMedroxyprogesterone AcetateNorethindronenorethindrone enanthateRNA, Ribosomal, 16Sfemale genital tractHIV riskhormonal contraceptioninflammationmicrobiomeSub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID34956191
PMCPMC8696178
OpenAlexW4200616258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.