Editorial: Interpreting the Comorbidity of Learning Disorders.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Boosting executive functions and math abilities in adolescents with dyscalculia: the combined effect of prismatic adaptation and cognitive training.Frontiers in psychology · 2025
   Trial
2. When Development Falls out of Sync: A Developmental Timing Framework for Learning Disabilities.Brain sciences · 2026
   Review
3. What Lies Behind Diagnostic Labels? High Intra-Individual Variability Is the True Cognitive Signature of University Students with Specific Learning Disorders.Brain sciences · 2026
   Article
4. A comparative study of EEG functional and effective connectivity patterns in children with learning difficulties during reading and math tasks.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025
   Article
5. "Calculating faces": can face perception paradigms enrich dyscalculia research?Frontiers in psychology · 2023
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as