Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34955789›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2021

Effects of Synergism of Mindfulness Practice Associated With Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation in Chronic Migraine: Pilot, Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Trial.

Luana Dias Santiago Pimenta, Elidianne Layanne Medeiros de Araújo, Joyce Poláine Dos Santos Silva, Jamyson Júnior França, Pedro Nascimento Araújo Brito, Ledycnarf Januário de Holanda, Ana Raquel Lindquist, Luiz Carlos Serramo Lopez, Suellen Marinho Andrade

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Non-Pharmacological Treatment for Chronic Migraine.Current pain and headache reports · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Luana Dias Santiago PimentaGraduate Program in Neuroscience and Behavior, Federal University of Paraíba, João Pessoa, Brazil.
Elidianne Layanne Medeiros de AraújoPhysiotherapy, Federal University of Paraíba, João Pessoa, Brazil.
Joyce Poláine Dos Santos SilvaPhysiotherapy, Federal University of Paraíba, João Pessoa, Brazil.
Jamyson Júnior FrançaPhysiotherapy, Federal University of Paraíba, João Pessoa, Brazil.
Pedro Nascimento Araújo BritoMedical, Federal University of Paraíba, João Pessoa, Brazil.
Ledycnarf Januário de HolandaGraduate Program in Physical Therapy, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.
Ana Raquel LindquistGraduate Program in Physical Therapy, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.
Luiz Carlos Serramo LopezGraduate Program in Neuroscience and Behavior, Federal University of Paraíba, João Pessoa, Brazil.
Suellen Marinho AndradeGraduate Program in Neuroscience and Behavior, Federal University of Paraíba, João Pessoa, Brazil.
Universidade Federal da Paraíba · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic migraine is a difficult disease to diagnose, and its pathophysiology remains undefined. Its symptoms affect the quality of life and daily living tasks of the affected person, leading to momentary disability. This is a pilot, randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial study with female patients between 18 and 65 years old with chronic migraine. The patients underwent twelve mindfulness sessions paired with anodal transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), with current intensity of 2 mA applied for 20 min, three times a week for 4 weeks. In addition, 20 min of mindfulness home practices were performed by guided meditation audio files. A total of 30 participants were evaluated after the treatment, and these were subdivided into two groups-active tDCS and sham tDCS, both set to mindfulness practice. The FFMQ-BR (Five Facet of Mindfulness Questionnaire), MIDAS (Migraine Disability Assessment), and HIT-6 (Headache Impact Test) questionnaires were used to evaluate the outcomes. After the treatment, the active mindfulness and tDCS group showed better results in all outcomes. The sham group also showed improvements, but with smaller effect sizes compared to the active group. The only significant difference in the intergroup analysis was the outcome evaluated by HIT-6 in the post treatment result. Our results provide the first therapeutic evidence of mindfulness practices associated with left DLPFC anodal tDCS with a consequent increase in the level of full attention and analgesic benefits in the clinical symptoms of patients with chronic migraine.

Indexed as

chronic migraineelectrostimulationfull attentionmindfulnesstranscranial direct-current stimulation

Identifiers

PMID34955789
PMCPMC8692277
OpenAlexW4200199084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.