Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34955708›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2021

Cardiovagal Baroreflex Hysteresis Using Ellipses in Response to Postural Changes.

Babak Dabiri, Joana Brito, Eugenijus Kaniusas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Babak DabiriInstitute of Electrodynamics, Microwave and Circuit Engineering, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria.
Joana BritoInstitute of Electrodynamics, Microwave and Circuit Engineering, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria.
Eugenijus KaniusasInstitute of Electrodynamics, Microwave and Circuit Engineering, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cardiovagal branch of the baroreflex is of high clinical relevance when detecting disturbances of the autonomic nervous system. The hysteresis of the baroreflex is assessed using provoked and spontaneous changes in blood pressure. We propose a novel ellipse analysis to characterize hysteresis of the spontaneous respiration-related cardiovagal baroreflex for orthostatic test. Up and down sequences of pressure changes as well as the working point of baroreflex are considered. The EuroBaVar data set for supine and standing was employed to extract heartbeat intervals and blood pressure values. The latter values formed polygons into which a bivariate normal distribution was fitted with its properties determining proposed ellipses of baroreflex. More than 80% of ellipses are formed out of nonoverlapping and delayed up and down sequences highlighting baroreflex hysteresis. In the supine position, the ellipses are more elongated (by about 46%) and steeper (by about 4.3° as median) than standing, indicating larger heart interval variability (70.7 versus 47.9 ms) and smaller blood pressure variability (5.8 versus 8.9 mmHg) in supine. The ellipses show a higher baroreflex sensitivity for supine (15.7 ms/mmHg as median) than standing (7 ms/mmHg). The center of the ellipse moves from supine to standing, which describes the overall sigmoid shape of the baroreflex with the moving working point. In contrast to regression analysis, the proposed method considers gain and set-point changes during respiration, offers instructive insights into the resulting hysteresis of the spontaneous cardiovagal baroreflex with respiration as stimuli, and provides a new tool for its future analysis.

Indexed as

autonomic nervous systembaroreflex sensitivitycardiovagal baroreflex hysteresisellipseorthostatic

Identifiers

PMID34955708
PMCPMC8695984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.