Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34955446›Full record

Trial reportJournal of geriatric oncology2022

Frailty and treatment outcome in advanced gastro-oesophageal cancer: An exploratory analysis of the GO2 trial.

Jessica Pearce, Daniel Swinson, David Cairns, Sherena Nair, Mark Baxter, Russell Petty, Matt Seymour, Peter Hall, Galina Velikova, GO2 trial investigators

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of geriatric oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Comparison of geriatric assessment with provider's clinical assessment among older adults with gastroesophageal cancer.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Jessica PearceLeeds Institute of Medical Research at St James', University of Leeds, Woodhouse, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK; Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Beckett Street, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK. Electronic address: j.pearce@leeds.ac.uk.
Daniel SwinsonLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Beckett Street, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK.
David CairnsLeeds Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
Sherena NairLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Beckett Street, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK.
Mark BaxterDivision of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Nethergate, Dundee DD1 4HN, UK.
Russell PettyTayside Cancer Centre, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, NHS Tayside, James Arrott Dr, Dundee DD2 1SG, UK.
Matt SeymourLeeds Institute of Medical Research at St James', University of Leeds, Woodhouse, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK; Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Beckett Street, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK.
Peter HallCancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, MRC Institute of Genetics & Molecular Medicine, The University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XR, UK.
Galina VelikovaLeeds Institute of Medical Research at St James', University of Leeds, Woodhouse, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK; Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Beckett Street, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK.
GO2 trial investigators
Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Leeds · GBCancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit · GBEdinburgh Cancer Research · GBNHS Tayside · GBUniversity of Dundee · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 25447Cancer Research UK 29637Cancer Research UK C7852/A25447Cancer Research UK CRUK/12/022Chief Scientist Office CAF/20/01Department of Health ACF-2019-02-006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionResearch into the optimal management of frail patients with cancer is limited and treatment decision-making in this cohort can be difficult. A number of measures have been developed to assess frailty, but few studies explore the correlation between frailty measures and cancer treatment outcomes.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study is an exploratory analysis of the GO2 randomised controlled trial. GO2 recruited both older and frail younger patients commencing first-line palliative chemotherapy for advanced gastro-oesophageal (aGO) cancer. This analysis aims to explore the correlation between baseline frailty and treatment outcome. Baseline frailty measures were derived from clinical data and included ECOG Performance Status (PS), the GO2 Frailty Score (GO2FS), Geriatric-8 (G8), Cancer and Aging Research Group (CARG) toxicity score and a 'modified' Rockwood Clinical Frailty Scale (mCFS). Novel patient-centred composite measure Overall Treatment Utility (OTU) was the primary endpoint. Ordinal logistic regression was undertaken to give odds ratios for poor vs good/intermediate OTU. Secondary endpoints were progression-free and overall survival. Models were adjusted for age, sex, histology, metastases, Trastuzumab and renal/hepatic function.

resultsIn GO2, 514 patients were randomised between three chemotherapy dose-levels; all of these patients were assessed for OTU and are included in this analysis. Worse GO2FS, mCFS and G8 scores all had a statistically significant association with poor (vs good/intermediate) OTU, progression and death, which persisted after adjustment. Adjusted odds ratios for poor OTU amongst those with the worst GO2FS and mCFS and best G8 scores were as follows: 1.85 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.20-2.88) for GO2FS ≥3 ('severely frail'), 1.72 (1.19-2.50) for mCFS 5+ ('frail') and 0.57 (0.32-1.00) for G8 > 14 ('normal'). Worse ECOG PS and CARG scores did not have a statistically significant association with poor OTU/progression/death.

conclusionIn this study, frailty identified via GO2FS, mCFS and G8 conveyed a statistically significant increased risk of worse treatment outcome in older and frail younger patients with aGO cancer. Frailty assessment provides information over and above PS and should be integrated alongside routine assessments in research and clinical practice. In the absence of prospective data, frailty measures can be derived retrospectively to build the evidence base around optimal care of frailer patients.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsFrailtyStomach NeoplasmsAgedFrail ElderlyGeriatric AssessmentHumansProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeFrailtyGastro-oesophageal cancerGCAGeriatric assessmentGeriatric oncologyOncogeriatrics

Identifiers

PMID34955446
PMCPMC8986151
OpenAlexW4200415599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.