Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34955398›Full record

ArticleJournal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS2022

RSTNCOVID Burns: A multi-centre service evaluation and stakeholder survey of the impact of COVID-19 on burns care in England, Wales and Northern Ireland.

Georgina S A Phillips, Justin C R Wormald, Ryo Yoshimura, Matthew D Gardiner, Jeremy N Rodrigues, Declan P Collins, RSTNCOVID Burns Collaborative

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Georgina S A PhillipsDepartment of Burns and Plastic Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Justin C R WormaldNuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences (NDORMS), Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, United Kingdom. Electronic address: justin.wormald@ndorms.ox.ac.uk.
Ryo YoshimuraHull York Medical School, John Hughlings Jackson Building, University Road, Heslington, York, United Kingdom.
Matthew D GardinerNuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences (NDORMS), Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, United Kingdom; Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Wexham Park Hospital, Slough, United Kingdom.
Jeremy N RodriguesNuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences (NDORMS), Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, United Kingdom; Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Aylesbury, United Kingdom.
Declan P CollinsDepartment of Burns and Plastic Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, South Kensington Campus, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/RSTN-@surgery_trials.
RSTNCOVID Burns Collaborative
Chelsea and Westminster Hospital · GBNuffield Orthopaedic Centre · GBHull York Medical School · GBWexham Park Hospital · GB

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the UK entered the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, the National Health Service published consensus guidance to the UK burns services advising changes to the acute management of burns to allow the continuation of safe care while protecting limited hospital resources. We aimed to describe the demographics of burns service users, changes to clinical pathways and experiences of the burns team during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. All burns services in the UK were invited to participate in a national collaborative, trainee-led study supported by the Reconstructive Surgery Trials Network. The study consisted of (1) a service evaluation of patients receiving burns treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic; (2) a multidisciplinary team survey. Analyses were descriptive and narrative depending on data types. Collaborators from 18 sites contributed data from burns MDT surveys and 512 patients. Patient demographics were consistent with typical burns patterns in the UK. The delayed presentation occurred in 20% of cases, with 24 patients developing complications. MDT surveys indicated substantial adaptations and challenges as a result of the pandemic. Access to theatres and critical care were limited, yet a comprehensive acute burns service was maintained. Telemedicine was utilised heavily to reduce patient footfall. Adaptations in the provision of burns care, including greater outpatient care and telemedicine, have emerged out of necessity with reported success. The impact of reduced scar therapy and psychological interventions for burns patients during the pandemic requires longer-term follow-up. Lessons from the UK experience can be used to strategise for future pandemics.

Indexed as

BurnsCOVID-19EnglandHumansNorthern IrelandPandemicsSARS-CoV-2State MedicineUnited KingdomWalesBurnsPandemicsSurgerySurveys and questionnairesWounds and injuries

Identifiers

PMID34955398
PMCPMC8631049
OpenAlexW3215459784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.