Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34955167›Full record

Observational studyBritish journal of anaesthesia2022

Association between tracheostomy timing and outcomes for older critically ill COVID-19 patients: prospective observational study in European intensive care units.

Kamil Polok, Jakub Fronczek, Peter Vernon van Heerden, Hans Flaatten, Bertrand Guidet, Dylan W De Lange, Jesper Fjølner, Susannah Leaver, Michael Beil, Sigal Sviri and 15 more

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in British journal of anaesthesia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04321265 unknown statusnot on this map

Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) in Very Old Intensive Care Patients

TypeobservationalSponsorHeinrich-Heine University, DuesseldorfRan2020 to 2023Enrolled1,500ConditionsCOVID-19, Elderly Patients, Critical Illness, Survival
NCT05465837 completednot on this map

Comparison Between Early and Late Tracheostomy in ICU Patients Including Non-Covid and Covid Patients, an Observational Cohort Study at SQUH

TypeobservationalSponsorSultan Qaboos UniversityRan2022 to 2022Enrolled156ConditionsNon-Covid, COVID-19ArmsTracheostomy
NCT07769021 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Observational iNternational Study of TRACHeostomy Practice in Adult Intensive Care Units - ON TRACH

TypeobservationalSponsorRoyal College of Surgeons, IrelandRan2026 to 2029Enrolled2,500ConditionsTracheostomy Patients, Tracheostomy Decannulation, Intensive Care (ICU)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Early versus late tracheostomy in critically ill COVID-19 patients.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Tracheostomy is associated with decreased in-hospital mortality during severe COVID-19 infection.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Predictors of Mortality in Patients With COVID-19 Undergoing Tracheotomy.The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Kamil PolokCenter for Intensive Care and Perioperative Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Jakub FronczekCenter for Intensive Care and Perioperative Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Peter Vernon van HeerdenDepartment of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Hadassah Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel.
Hans FlaattenDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Bertrand GuidetSorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, UMR_S 1136, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Equipe: Epidémiologie Hospitalière Qualité et Organisation des Soins, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Dylan W De LangeDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center, University Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Jesper FjølnerDepartment of Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Susannah LeaverResearch Lead Critical Care Directorate St George's Hospital, London, UK.
Michael BeilMedical Intensive Care Unit, Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Sigal SviriDepartment of Medical Intensive Care, Hadassah Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel.
Raphael Romano BrunoDepartment of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Vascular Medicine, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Bernhard WernlyDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria; Center for Public Health and Healthcare Research, Paracelsus Medical University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Antonio ArtigasCritical Care Department, Corporacion Sanitaria Universitaria Parc Tauli, CIBER Enfermedades Respiratorias, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Sabadell, Spain.
Bernardo Bollen PintoDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Pharmacology and Intensive Care, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Joerg C SchefoldDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Dorota StudzińskaCenter for Intensive Care and Perioperative Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Michael JoannidisDivision of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Sandra OeyenDepartment of Intensive Care 1K12IC, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Brian MarshMater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Finn H AndersenDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Ålesund Hospital, Ålesund, Norway; Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Rui MorenoUnidade de Cuidados Intensivos Neurocríticos e Trauma, Hospital de São José, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas de Lisboa (Nova Médical School), Lisbon, Portugal.
Maurizio CecconiDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Christian JungDepartment of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Vascular Medicine, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Wojciech SzczeklikCenter for Intensive Care and Perioperative Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland. Electronic address: wojciech.szczeklik@uj.edu.pl.
COVIP study group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTracheostomy is performed in patients expected to require prolonged mechanical ventilation, but to date optimal timing of tracheostomy has not been established. The evidence concerning tracheostomy in COVID-19 patients is particularly scarce. We aimed to describe the relationship between early tracheostomy (≤10 days since intubation) and outcomes for patients with COVID-19.

methodsThis was a prospective cohort study performed in 152 centres across 16 European countries from February to December 2020. We included patients aged ≥70 yr with confirmed COVID-19 infection admitted to an intensive care unit, requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. Multivariable analyses were performed to evaluate the association between early tracheostomy and clinical outcomes including 3-month mortality, intensive care length of stay, and duration of mechanical ventilation.

resultsThe final analysis included 1740 patients with a mean age of 74 yr. Tracheostomy was performed in 461 (26.5%) patients. The tracheostomy rate varied across countries, from 8.3% to 52.9%. Early tracheostomy was performed in 135 (29.3%) patients. There was no difference in 3-month mortality between early and late tracheostomy in either our primary analysis (hazard ratio [HR]=0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70-1.33) or a secondary landmark analysis (HR=0.78; 95% CI, 0.57-1.06).

conclusionsThere is a wide variation across Europe in the timing of tracheostomy for critically ill patients with COVID-19. However, we found no evidence that early tracheostomy is associated with any effect on survival amongst older critically ill patients with COVID-19. CLINICAL

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04321265.

Indexed as

AgedCorrelation of DataCOVID-19Critical CareCritical IllnessEuropeFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsLength of StayMaleProspective StudiesRespiration, ArtificialSurvival RateTime FactorsTracheostomyCOVID-19healthcareintensive care unitsmechanical ventilationoutcome assessmenttracheostomy

Identifiers

PMID34955167
PMCPMC8627864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.