ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2022
Long-term satisfaction of patients after laparoscopic and robotic-assisted hysterectomy.
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Robotic versus open (or laparoscopic) hysterectomy: a comprehensive review of clinical, surgical, and economic outcomes.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Patient-reported outcomes after hysterectomy due to pelvic organ prolapse versus other indications - a 10-year national follow-up study.BMC women's health · 2026Article
- Implementation of a new robotic system: challenges for the surgical team and ethical concerns about patient safety, a longitudinal questionnaire study.BMJ connections surgery · 2026Article
- Robot-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: is there a correlation between uterine diameters, pelvic volume, and surgical outcomes?Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Multicenter evaluation of the DEXTER® Robotic Surgery System for Total Hysterectomy with Adnexal Surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Observational
- Comparative analysis of postoperative inflammation and pain: robot-assisted versus single-incision laparoscopic surgery for right-sided colon cancer.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the effect of the type of hysterectomy on the incidence of stress urinary incontinence.Przeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review · 2025Review
- Robotic-assisted surgery in benign gynecology: single-center experience with 106 patients.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- An eight-year analysis of robotic surgery in morbidly obese women with endometrial cancer in a tertiary center in Singapore.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2024Article
- Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynaecology: An Evolving Assistive Technology.Surgical innovation · 2024Review
- The first robotic-assisted hysterectomy below the bikini line with the Dexter robotic system™.Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2024Article
- Expanding Robotic-Assisted Surgery in Gynecology Using the Potential of an Advanced Robotic System.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Review
- Robotic-assisted Gynecological Surgery in Older Patients - a Comparative Cohort Study of Perioperative Outcomes.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2023Article
- Learning curve analysis of multiport robot-assisted hysterectomy.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDa-Vinci-Xi is the most recent device used in gynecologic robotic surgery. The aim of the present study was to compare the long-term satisfaction of patients who had undergone conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy or robotic assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy using the Da-Vinci-Xi surgical system.
methodsAll hysterectomies performed at the University Hospital of Luebeck from 2018 to 2019 were reviewed. Postoperative outcomes were compared between women who had undergone total hysterectomy with da Vinci Xi (n = 42) or conventional laparoscopy (n = 97). Postoperative outcomes included pain, elimination of complaints after surgery, bladder function, sexual function, satisfaction with the cosmetic outcome, positive experiences after robotic surgery, and satisfaction with the surgeon's preoperative explanation. Obese patients were evaluated separately in a subgroup analysis.
resultsBoth groups had similar baseline characteristics and complication rates. Preoperative complaints subsided after surgery in a little more than 90% of patients. No significant differences were noted between groups in this regard (p = 0.262), or with reference to postoperative pain after one week (p = 0.866) and one month (p = 0.580), stress incontinence (p = 0.343), sexual function (p = 0.766) and the cosmetic outcome of the abdominal incisions (p = 0.273). The majority of patients who had undergone robotic surgery (96.8%) would be willing to undergo the procedure again if necessary. The subgroup analysis of obese patients revealed no significant differences.
conclusionThe Da-Vinci-Xi device did not improve the long-term surgical satisfaction of normal-weight or obese patients who underwent hysterectomy compared with patients who underwent conventional laparoscopy performed by experienced laparoscopic surgeons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.