Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34954814›Full record

ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2022

Long-term satisfaction of patients after laparoscopic and robotic-assisted hysterectomy.

Georgios Gitas, I Alkatout, L Proppe, L Hanker, L Allahqoli, G Grimbizis, A Rody, N Werner, S Sommer, S Baum

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Learning curve analysis of multiport robot-assisted hysterectomy.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Georgios GitasDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Schleswig Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, Haus A, 23538, Luebeck, Germany. g.gitas@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9242-8041
I AlkatoutDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Schleswig Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
L ProppeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Schleswig Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, Haus A, 23538, Luebeck, Germany.
L HankerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Schleswig Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, Haus A, 23538, Luebeck, Germany.
L AllahqoliSchool of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, Iran.
G GrimbizisFirst Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
A RodyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Schleswig Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, Haus A, 23538, Luebeck, Germany.
N WernerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Schleswig Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, Haus A, 23538, Luebeck, Germany.
S SommerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Schleswig Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, Haus A, 23538, Luebeck, Germany.
S BaumDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Schleswig Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, Haus A, 23538, Luebeck, Germany.
University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DEAristotle University of Thessaloniki · GRIran University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDa-Vinci-Xi is the most recent device used in gynecologic robotic surgery. The aim of the present study was to compare the long-term satisfaction of patients who had undergone conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy or robotic assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy using the Da-Vinci-Xi surgical system.

methodsAll hysterectomies performed at the University Hospital of Luebeck from 2018 to 2019 were reviewed. Postoperative outcomes were compared between women who had undergone total hysterectomy with da Vinci Xi (n = 42) or conventional laparoscopy (n = 97). Postoperative outcomes included pain, elimination of complaints after surgery, bladder function, sexual function, satisfaction with the cosmetic outcome, positive experiences after robotic surgery, and satisfaction with the surgeon's preoperative explanation. Obese patients were evaluated separately in a subgroup analysis.

resultsBoth groups had similar baseline characteristics and complication rates. Preoperative complaints subsided after surgery in a little more than 90% of patients. No significant differences were noted between groups in this regard (p = 0.262), or with reference to postoperative pain after one week (p = 0.866) and one month (p = 0.580), stress incontinence (p = 0.343), sexual function (p = 0.766) and the cosmetic outcome of the abdominal incisions (p = 0.273). The majority of patients who had undergone robotic surgery (96.8%) would be willing to undergo the procedure again if necessary. The subgroup analysis of obese patients revealed no significant differences.

conclusionThe Da-Vinci-Xi device did not improve the long-term surgical satisfaction of normal-weight or obese patients who underwent hysterectomy compared with patients who underwent conventional laparoscopy performed by experienced laparoscopic surgeons.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyRobotic Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansHysterectomyObesityPatient SatisfactionPersonal SatisfactionRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeDa Vinci XiLaparoscopic hysterectomyPatient satisfactionQuestionnaireRobotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID34954814
PMCPMC9166875
OpenAlexW4200065876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.