ArticleJournal of virological methods2022
A localized small-scale external quality assessment (EQA) for PCR testing of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in the molecular laboratories.
Article in Journal of virological methods, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimizing heat inactivation for SARS-CoV-2 at 95 °C and its implications: A standardized approach.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Assessing the comparability of cycle threshold values derived from five external quality assessment rounds for omicron nucleic acid testing.Virology journal · 2023Article
- External quality assessment for laboratories in pan-India ILI/SARI surveillance for simultaneous detection of influenza virus and SARS-CoV-2.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to estimate the PCR results for SARS-CoV-2 testing in 32 participating laboratories in a localized small-scale external quality assessment (EQA) scheme. EQA samples were distributed to the participants and detected immediately on the day of delivery. Qualitative results were submitted to the EQA provider, including negative or positive results along with cycle threshold (Ct) values for different target genes. Although the variability of Ct values differed among the laboratories in the EQA, a total of 32 (100 %) participants reported correct qualitative results. The study showed that the mean loads of N or E gene were higher than those of ORF1ab in SARS-CoV-2 RNA samples. Regardless of the analyzed gene target, the mean Ct values for weak positive and positive samples varied by fewer than 1.74 and 1.91 cycles, respectively. Less than 12 % of reported Ct values for ORF1ab and N genes deviated by more than ±4 cycles (maximum: -9.92 cycles), while none deviated by more than ±4 cycles for the E gene. The current EQA program can provide a robust practical basis for follow-up planning to conduct evaluations for SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing and other novel emerging pathogens in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.