ArticleAppetite2022
The modern gut-hammer: Understanding the eating habits of loggers through Photovoice.
Article in Appetite, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Qualitative perspectives on safety, health, and productivity from Northeast United States loggers: Implications for industry sustainability.Forest policy and economics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
"Give Us Your Best Shot" is a Photovoice project designed to shed a light on loggers' food choices, attitudes toward and challenges around eating. This research focused on answering the question: What do you typically eat on a workday and where do you get it (breakfast, lunch, dinner, snacks, and drinks)? Consider: What makes it hard to eat healthier? If you feel you eat healthy, how do you do it? Participants were asked to take a photo to answer our research question at least once a week for a six-week period in autumn 2019. Photos and comments were exported from REDCap and imported into NVivo 12, a qualitative analysis software. Two members of the research team analyzed these data. In total, six male Maine loggers, ages 33 to 64, took part in the Photovoice project. Several themes emerged from these data including, but not limited to, the conflict between stated feelings about diet and health and actual consumption habits, the priority of health among many demands, and perceived healthfulness. Data analysis revealed time and family to be significant influential factors affecting loggers' attitudes and ability to eat healthfully. Modern trends toward processed and pre-made food resulting in less home cooking, impacts how and what loggers eat. This project served to show that food choice and diet are modulated by complex outside forces and that improving diet is not a straightforward task. Maine loggers are coping with the same struggles that many workers face, with the added hardship of dealing with extremely long work hours and commutes, leaving little time for anything else. These factors should be taken into consideration when planning any nutrition related interventions with logging workers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.