Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34954139›Full record

ArticleBiological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging2022

A Computational Analysis of Abnormal Belief Updating Processes and Their Association With Psychotic Experiences and Childhood Trauma in a UK Birth Cohort.

Jazz Croft, Christoph Teufel, Jon Heron, Paul C Fletcher, Anthony S David, Glyn Lewis, Michael Moutoussis, Thomas H B FitzGerald, David E J Linden, Andrew Thompson and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Belief Updating and Paranoia in Individuals With Schizophrenia.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 10 institutions in 5 countries.

Jazz CroftCentre for Academic Mental Health, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Christoph TeufelCardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre, School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom. Electronic address: teufelc@cardiff.ac.uk.
Jon HeronCentre for Academic Mental Health, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Paul C FletcherCambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Anthony S DavidUniversity College London Institute of Mental Health, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Glyn LewisUniversity College London Institute of Mental Health, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Michael MoutoussisWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Thomas H B FitzGeraldSchool of Psychology, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom.
David E J LindenCardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre, School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom; School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Andrew ThompsonWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Warwick, United Kingdom; Orygen, The Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Peter B JonesDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Mary CannonDepartment of Psychiatry, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Peter HolmansMedical Research Council Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics, Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Rick A AdamsCentre for Medical Image Computing and AI, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Max Planck-UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, London, United Kingdom.
Stan ZammitCentre for Academic Mental Health, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom; Medical Research Council Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics, Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
University of Bristol · GBCardiff University · GBInstitute of Mental Health · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBMaastricht University · NLProstate Cancer Research · GBRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IEThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of East Anglia · GBWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging · GB

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council G9815508Medical Research Council MC_PC_15018Medical Research Council MC_PC_19009Medical Research Council MR/L010305/1Medical Research Council MR/M006727/1Medical Research Council MR/S003436/1Medical Research Council MR/S007806/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 217065/Z/19/ZWellcome Trust 49 206368/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPsychotic experiences emerge from abnormalities in perception and belief formation and occur more commonly in those experiencing childhood trauma. However, which precise aspects of belief formation are atypical in psychosis is not well understood. We used a computational modeling approach to characterize belief updating in young adults in the general population, examine their relationship with psychotic outcomes and trauma, and determine the extent to which they mediate the trauma-psychosis relationship.

methodsWe used data from 3360 individuals from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children birth cohort who completed assessments for psychotic outcomes, depression, anxiety, and two belief updating tasks at age 24 and had data available on traumatic events assessed from birth to late adolescence. Unadjusted and adjusted regression and counterfactual mediation methods were used for the analyses.

resultsBasic behavioral measures of belief updating (draws-to-decision and disconfirmatory updating) were not associated with psychotic experiences. However, computational modeling revealed an association between increased decision noise with both psychotic experiences and trauma exposure, although <3% of the trauma-psychotic experience association was mediated by decision noise. Belief updating measures were also associated with intelligence and sociodemographic characteristics, confounding most of the associations with psychotic experiences. There was little evidence that belief updating parameters were differentially associated with delusions compared with hallucinations or that they were differentially associated with psychotic outcomes compared with depression or anxiety.

conclusionsThese findings challenge the hypothesis that atypical belief updating mechanisms (as indexed by the computational models and behavioral measures we used) underlie the development of psychotic phenomena.

Indexed as

Adverse Childhood ExperiencesPsychotic DisordersAdolescentAdultBirth CohortChildHumansLongitudinal StudiesUnited KingdomYoung AdultALSPACBelief updatingChildhood traumaCognitionComputational psychiatryPsychosis

Identifiers

PMID34954139
PMCPMC9259502
OpenAlexW4200171872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.