ArticleDental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials2022
Succession of oral bacterial colonizers on dental implant materials: An in vitro biofilm model.
Article in Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Surface-related factors affecting bacterial adhesion on dental implants: a short literature review.The journal of advanced prosthodontics · 2026Review
- The impact of DNA extraction methods on species quantification and apparent community composition of in vitro oral biofilms.FEMS microbiology letters · 2026Article
- Simulated oral environment affects zirconia aging and mechanical strength.Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · 2026Article
- Biofilm Formation on Various Implant Surface Modifications: AnJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2025Article
- Micro- and nano-scale adhesion of oral bacteria to biomaterials using atomic force microscopy: A systematic review.The Japanese dental science review · 2025Review
- Influence of alumina shot blasting induced roughness on bacterial adhesion to titanium.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Article
- Biofilms and oral health: nanotechnology for biofilm control.Discover nano · 2025Review
- Influence of species composition and cultivation condition on peri-implant biofilm dysbiosisFrontiers in oral health · 2025Article
- Bacterial colonization of bone substitute materials used in oral surgery: mechanisms, clinical implications, and preventive strategies-A narrative review.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- Effect of implant abutment surface treatments on bacterial biofilm composition and structure.Journal of oral microbiology · 2025Article
- Oral microbiota interactions with titanium implants: A pilot in-vivo and in-vitro study on the impact of peri-implantitis.PloS one · 2025Article
- Development of a Coculture Model for Assessing Competing Host Mammalian Cell and Bacterial Attachment on Zirconia versus Titanium.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2024Article
- The Influence of Selected Titanium Alloy Micro-Texture Parameters on Bacterial Adhesion.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Antimicrobial activity ofPeerJ · 2024Article
- Enhanced Bacterial and Biofilm Adhesion Resistance of ALD Nano-TiOInternational journal of nanomedicine · 2024Article
- Bacterial Adhesion Strength on Titanium Surfaces Quantified by Atomic Force Microscopy: A Systematic Review.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Influence of Dental Titanium Implants with Different Surface Treatments Using Femtosecond and Nanosecond Lasers on Biofilm Formation.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Article
- Antibiofilm peptides enhance the corrosion resistance of titanium in the presence ofFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesOral bacterial adhesion on dental implant materials has been extensively studied using in vitro systems but has yielded results restricted to in vitro growth patterns due to limitations in species selection, sustained fastidious anaerobe growth, and mixed culture longevity. The aim of this study was to develop an oral bacterial biofilm model consisting of colonizers representative of the oral microbiome exhibiting temporal shifts characteristic of plaque development and maturation in vivo.
methodsStreptococcus oralis, Actinomyces naeslundii, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Veillonella parvula, Fusobacterium nucleatum, and Porphyromonas gingivalis were grown in monoculture prior to combination in mixed culture. Commercially pure titanium (cpTi) and yttria-stabilized zirconia (ZrO
resultsEarly-colonizing S. oralis and A. actinomycetemcomitans, dominated after 6 h prior to secondary colonization by F. nucleatum and V. parvula in planktonic (1 day) and sessile (3 days) form. A. naeslundii maintained relatively low but stable bacterial counts throughout testing. After 14 days, late-colonizing P. gingivalis became established in mixed culture and persisted, becoming the dominant species after 21 days. The composition of adherent bacteria across all substrates was statistically similar at all timepoints with notable exceptions including lower S. oralis bacterial counts on polished cpTi (3 days). SIGNIFICANCE: Within the present model's limitations, multispecies oral bacterial attachment is similar on surface-treated cpTi and ZrO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.