Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34953356›Full record

ReviewComputers in biology and medicine2022

Review and classification of AI-enabled COVID-19 CT imaging models based on computer vision tasks.

Haseeb Hassan, Zhaoyu Ren, Huishi Zhao, Shoujin Huang, Dan Li, Shaohua Xiang, Yan Kang, Sifan Chen, Bingding Huang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Computers in biology and medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Omnidirectional 2.5D representation for COVID-19 diagnosis using chest CTs.Journal of visual communication and image representation · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Haseeb HassanCollege of Big Data and Internet, Shenzhen Technology University, Shenzhen, China; Guangdong Key Laboratory for Biomedical Measurements and Ultrasound Imaging, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shenzhen University Health Science Center, Shenzhen, China.
Zhaoyu RenCollege of Big Data and Internet, Shenzhen Technology University, Shenzhen, China.
Huishi ZhaoCollege of Big Data and Internet, Shenzhen Technology University, Shenzhen, China.
Shoujin HuangCollege of Big Data and Internet, Shenzhen Technology University, Shenzhen, China.
Dan LiCollege of Big Data and Internet, Shenzhen Technology University, Shenzhen, China.
Shaohua XiangCollege of Big Data and Internet, Shenzhen Technology University, Shenzhen, China.
Yan KangGuangdong Key Laboratory for Biomedical Measurements and Ultrasound Imaging, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shenzhen University Health Science Center, Shenzhen, China; Medical Device Innovation Research Center, Shenzhen Technology University, Shenzhen, China.
Sifan ChenGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Guangdong-Hong Kong Joint Laboratory for RNA Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China; Medical Research Center, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Bingding HuangCollege of Big Data and Internet, Shenzhen Technology University, Shenzhen, China. Electronic address: huangbingding@sztu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article presents a systematic overview of artificial intelligence (AI) and computer vision strategies for diagnosing the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) using computerized tomography (CT) medical images. We analyzed the previous review works and found that all of them ignored classifying and categorizing COVID-19 literature based on computer vision tasks, such as classification, segmentation, and detection. Most of the COVID-19 CT diagnosis methods comprehensively use segmentation and classification tasks. Moreover, most of the review articles are diverse and cover CT as well as X-ray images. Therefore, we focused on the COVID-19 diagnostic methods based on CT images. Well-known search engines and databases such as Google, Google Scholar, Kaggle, Baidu, IEEE Xplore, Web of Science, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Scopus were utilized to collect relevant studies. After deep analysis, we collected 114 studies and reported highly enriched information for each selected research. According to our analysis, AI and computer vision have substantial potential for rapid COVID-19 diagnosis as they could significantly assist in automating the diagnosis process. Accurate and efficient models will have real-time clinical implications, though further research is still required. Categorization of literature based on computer vision tasks could be helpful for future research; therefore, this review article will provide a good foundation for conducting such research.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCOVID-19ComputersCOVID-19 TestingHumansSARS-CoV-2Tomography, X-Ray ComputedCOVID-19COVID-19 classificationCOVID-19 detectionCOVID-19 diagnosisImage segmentation

Identifiers

PMID34953356
PMCPMC8684223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.