Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34953172›Full record

ArticleThe New phytologist2022

Flowers prepare thyselves: leaf and root herbivores induce specific changes in floral phytochemistry with consequences for plant interactions with florivores.

Quint Rusman, Sanne Hooiveld-Knoppers, Mirjam Dijksterhuis, Janneke Bloem, Michael Reichelt, Marcel Dicke, Erik H Poelman

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The New phytologist, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Quint RusmanLaboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University & Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, Wageningen, 6708PB, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0285-7967
Sanne Hooiveld-KnoppersLaboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University & Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, Wageningen, 6708PB, the Netherlands.
Mirjam DijksterhuisLaboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University & Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, Wageningen, 6708PB, the Netherlands.
Janneke BloemLaboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University & Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, Wageningen, 6708PB, the Netherlands.
Michael ReicheltDepartment of Biochemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Hans-Knöll-Strasse 8, 07745, Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6691-6500
Marcel DickeLaboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University & Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, Wageningen, 6708PB, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8565-8896
Erik H PoelmanLaboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University & Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, Wageningen, 6708PB, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3285-613X
Wageningen University & Research · NLMax Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The phenotypic plasticity of flowering plants in response to herbivore damage to vegetative tissues can affect plant interactions with flower-feeding organisms. Such induced systemic responses are probably regulated by defence-related phytohormones that signal flowers to alter secondary chemistry that affects resistance to florivores. Current knowledge on the effects of damage to vegetative tissues on plant interactions with florivores and the underlying mechanisms is limited. We compared the preference and performance of two florivores on flowering Brassica nigra plants damaged by one of three herbivores feeding from roots or leaves. To investigate the underlying mechanisms, we quantified expression patterns of marker genes for defence-related phytohormonal pathways, and concentrations of phytohormones and glucosinolates in buds and flowers. Florivores displayed contrasting preferences for plants damaged by herbivores feeding on roots and leaves. Chewing florivores performed better on plants damaged by folivores, but worse on plants damaged by the root herbivore. Chewing root and foliar herbivory led to specific induced changes in the phytohormone profile of buds and flowers. This resulted in increased glucosinolate concentrations for leaf-damaged plants, and decreased glucosinolate concentrations for root-damaged plants. The outcome of herbivore-herbivore interactions spanning from vegetative tissues to floral tissues is unique for the inducing root/leaf herbivore and receiving florivore combination.

Indexed as

FlowersHerbivoryMustard PlantPlant Growth RegulatorsPlant LeavesPlant Growth RegulatorsBrassica nigraflower-feeding organismsflowersglucosinolatesherbivore-induced plant responsesphenotypic plasticityphytohormonesplant defence

Identifiers

PMID34953172
PMCPMC9305281
OpenAlexW4200047248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.