Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34953091›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular electrophysiology2022

Economics and outcomes of sotalol in-patient dosing approaches in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Daniel L Varela, Tyson S Burnham, Heidi T May, Tami L Bair, Benjamin A Steinberg, Joseph B Muhlestein, Jeffrey L Anderson, Kirk U Knowlton, Thomas Jared Bunch

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel L VarelaCardiology Division, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Tyson S BurnhamCardiology Division, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Heidi T MayIntermountain Medical Center Heart Institute, Murray, Utah, USA.
Tami L BairIntermountain Medical Center Heart Institute, Murray, Utah, USA.
Benjamin A SteinbergCardiology Division, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4729-7820
Joseph B MuhlesteinCardiology Division, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Jeffrey L AndersonIntermountain Medical Center Heart Institute, Murray, Utah, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0825-8685
Kirk U KnowltonIntermountain Medical Center Heart Institute, Murray, Utah, USA.
Thomas Jared BunchCardiology Division, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5349-0136
University of Utah · USIntermountain Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere exists variability in the administration of in-patient sotalol therapy for symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). The impact of this variability on patient in-hospital and 30-day posthospitalization costs and outcomes is not known. Also, the cost impact of intravenous sotalol, which can accelerate drug loading to therapeutic levels, is unknown.

methodsOne hundred and thirty-three AF patients admitted for oral sotalol initiation at an Intermountain Healthcare Hospital from January 2017 to December 2018 were included. Patient and dosing characteristics were described descriptively and the impact of dosing schedule was correlated with daily hospital costs/clinical outcomes during the index hospitalization and for 30 days. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services reimbursement for 3-day sotalol initiation is $9263.51. Projections of cost savings were made considering a 1-day load using intravenous sotalol that costs $2500.00 to administer.

resultsThe average age was 70.3 ± 12.3 years and 60.2% were male with comorbidities of hypertension (83%), diabetes (36%), and coronary artery disease (53%). The mean ejection fraction was 59.9 ± 7.8% and the median corrected QT interval was 453.7 ± 37.6 ms before sotalol dosing. No ventricular arrhythmias developed, but bradycardia (<60 bpm) was observed in 37.6% of patients. The average length of stay was 3.9 ± 4.6 (median: 2.2) days. Postdischarge outcomes and rehospitalization rates stratified by length of stay were similar. The cost per day was estimated at $2931.55 (1. $2931.55, 2. $5863.10, 3. $8794.65, 4. $11 726.20).

conclusionsIn-patient oral sotalol dosing is markedly variable and results in the potential of both cost gain and loss to a hospital. In consideration of estimated costs, there is the potential for $871.55 cost savings compared to a 2-day oral load and $3803.10 compared to a 3-day oral load.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationSotalolAftercareAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Arrhythmia AgentsHumansMaleMedicareMiddle AgedPatient DischargeUnited StatesAnti-Arrhythmia AgentsSotalolantiarrhythmic drug loadingatrial fibrillationcost economicssotalol

Identifiers

PMID34953091
PMCPMC9305518
OpenAlexW4200070032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.