Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34953039›Full record

ReviewESC heart failure2022

Heart failure with recovered ejection fraction and the utility of defibrillator therapy: a review.

Jasneet K Devgun, Samuel Kennedy, Jeremy Slivnick, Zachary Garrett, Katherine Dodd, Mohamed H Derbala, Cristina Ortiz, Sakima A Smith

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ESC heart failure, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Myocardial Recovery and Relapse in Heart Failure With Improved Ejection Fraction.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jasneet K DevgunDepartment of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Samuel KennedyThe Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.
Jeremy SlivnickDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Zachary GarrettDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Katherine DoddDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Mohamed H DerbalaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0420-3521
Cristina OrtizDepartment of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Sakima A SmithDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3887-9180
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · USNorthwestern University · USThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heart failure with recovered ejection fraction (HFrecEF) involves those who have previously had reduced cardiac function that has subsequently improved. However, there is not a single definition of this phenomenon and recovery of cardiac function in terms of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) itself does not necessarily correlate with remission from the detrimental physiology of heart failure (HF) and its consequences. There is also the question of the utility of defibrillators in these patients, and whether they should be replaced at the time of battery depletion. To address this, several studies have shown specific predictors of ensuing LVEF recovery, including patient demographics, co-morbidities, and medication use, as well as predictors of ventricular arrhythmias (VA) following LVEF recovery. Recent studies have also shown novel imaging parameters that may aid in predicting which patients would have a higher risk of these arrhythmias. Additional data describe a small, yet appreciable risk of VA, in addition to appropriate shocks as well. In this review, we describe predictors of LVEF recovery, carefully analyse and characterize the continued risk for VA and appropriate shocks following LVEF recovery, and explore additional novel modalities that may aid in decision-making.

Indexed as

Heart FailureVentricular Function, LeftArrhythmias, CardiacDefibrillatorsHumansStroke VolumeDefibrillatorEjection fractionHeart failureRecoveredSudden cardiac death

Identifiers

PMID34953039
PMCPMC8787956
OpenAlexW4200302173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.