Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34953028›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2022

Operationalizing a patient engagement plan for health research: Sharing a codesigned planning template from a national clinical trial.

Holly Etchegary, Andrea Pike, Andrea M Patey, Erin Gionet, Brian Johnston, Susan Goold, Vanessa Francis, Jeremy Grimshaw, Amanda Hall, De-Implementing Wisely Research Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Operationalizing a patient engagement plan for health research: Sharing a codesigned planning template from a national clinical trial.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Holly EtchegaryClinical Epidemiology Program, Faculty of Medicine, Patient Engagement Lead, NL SUPPORT, CIHR-SPOR, Craig L. Dobbin Centre for Genetics, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9673-0726
Andrea PikePrimary HealthCare Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.
Andrea M PateyCentre for Implementation Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Erin GionetPatient Engagement Coordinator (CWC-iCT), Cumming School of Medicine University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Brian JohnstonPatient Partnership Council (CWC-iCT), Quality of Care NL/Choosing Wisely NL, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.
Susan GooldPatient Partnership Council, (CWC-iCT), Quality of Care NL, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.
Vanessa FrancisPatient Partnership Council, (CWC-iCT), Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.
Jeremy GrimshawDepartment of Medicine, Centre for Implementation Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Amanda HallPrimary HealthCare Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.
De-Implementing Wisely Research Group

Funding

CIHR MYG-158642
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEngaging with patients about their lived experience of health and illness and their experience within the healthcare system can help inform the provision of care, health policies and health research. In the context of health research, however, operationalizing the levels of patient engagement is not straightforward. We suggest that a key challenge to the routine inclusion of patients as partners in health research is a lack of tangible guidance regarding how this can be accomplished.

methodsIn this article, we provide guidance on how to codesign and operationalize a concrete patient engagement plan for any health research project.

resultsWe illustrate a seven-step approach using the example of a national clinical trial in Canada and provide a patient engagement planning template for use in any health research project.

conclusionSuch concrete guidance should improve the design and reporting of patient engagement in health research. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The De-Implementing Wisely Research group is informed by a national 9-member patient partner council (PPC). The research team includes three lead patient partners who are coinvestigators on the grant that funds the program of research. Members of the council advise on all aspects of the study design and implementation. The ideas presented in this paper were informed by regular communication and planning with the PPC; specific contributions of lead patient partner authors are outlined as follows: Brian Johnston, Susan Goold and Vanessa Francis are patient partners with a wide breadth of experience in the healthcare system and health research projects. The guidance in this article draws on their lived and professional expertise. All patient partner authors contributed to the planning of the manuscript, participated in meetings to develop content and provided critical manuscript edits and comments on drafts.

Indexed as

CommunicationPatient ParticipationCanadaClinical Trials as TopicHumanslevels of engagementpatient engagementpatient-oriented researchplanning tool

Identifiers

PMID34953028
PMCPMC8957743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.