ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2022
Operationalizing a patient engagement plan for health research: Sharing a codesigned planning template from a national clinical trial.
Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Operationalizing Trauma-Informed Principles to Build Safe, Inclusive, and Equitable Patient Partnerships in Pediatric Pain Research.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- Understanding the Scope, Intent and Extent of Published Conceptual Frameworks of Frameworks for Patient and Public Involvement in Health and Social Care Research: A Rapid Scoping Review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
- Article
- Patient engagement strategies in digital health interventions for cancer survivors: A scoping review.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- The psychosocial impact of exercise as an intervention for persons living with obesity and female infertility: A rapid scoping review and pilot study.PLOS mental health · 2025Article
- Establishing patient partners' roles on research teams: a scoping review.Research involvement and engagement · 2024Article
- Co-creation of a qualitative fertility research study to understand waiting time experiences through patient engagement.Research involvement and engagement · 2024Article
- Article
- Primus Inter PARES: First among equals-practical strategies for young adult PAtient RESearch partners (PARES) by young adult PARES.Research involvement and engagement · 2024Article
- Exploring the outcomes of research engagement using the observation method in an online setting.BMJ open · 2023Article
- "I think there has to be a mutual respect for there to be value": Evaluating patient engagement in a national clinical trial on de-implementation of low value care.Research involvement and engagement · 2023Article
- Patient-identified priorities for successful partnerships in patient-oriented research.Research involvement and engagement · 2022Article
- Operationalizing a patient engagement plan for health research: Sharing a codesigned planning template from a national clinical trial.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionEngaging with patients about their lived experience of health and illness and their experience within the healthcare system can help inform the provision of care, health policies and health research. In the context of health research, however, operationalizing the levels of patient engagement is not straightforward. We suggest that a key challenge to the routine inclusion of patients as partners in health research is a lack of tangible guidance regarding how this can be accomplished.
methodsIn this article, we provide guidance on how to codesign and operationalize a concrete patient engagement plan for any health research project.
resultsWe illustrate a seven-step approach using the example of a national clinical trial in Canada and provide a patient engagement planning template for use in any health research project.
conclusionSuch concrete guidance should improve the design and reporting of patient engagement in health research. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The De-Implementing Wisely Research group is informed by a national 9-member patient partner council (PPC). The research team includes three lead patient partners who are coinvestigators on the grant that funds the program of research. Members of the council advise on all aspects of the study design and implementation. The ideas presented in this paper were informed by regular communication and planning with the PPC; specific contributions of lead patient partner authors are outlined as follows: Brian Johnston, Susan Goold and Vanessa Francis are patient partners with a wide breadth of experience in the healthcare system and health research projects. The guidance in this article draws on their lived and professional expertise. All patient partner authors contributed to the planning of the manuscript, participated in meetings to develop content and provided critical manuscript edits and comments on drafts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.